ENHU vs. FTAG
ENHU (iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF) and FTAG (First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ENHU is actively managed, while FTAG is passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ENHU charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FTAG.
Performance
ENHU vs. FTAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENHU achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly higher than FTAG's 6.79% return.
ENHU
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTAG
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -3.74%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 6.97%
- 1Y
- 8.43%
- 3Y*
- 3.75%
- 5Y*
- 0.85%
- 10Y*
- 5.38%
ENHU vs. FTAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 8.83% | 1.32% |
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 6.79% | 4.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENHU and FTAG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENHU vs. FTAG — Risk / Return Rank
ENHU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTAG
ENHU vs. FTAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENHU | FTAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.04 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENHU vs. FTAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENHU drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, smaller than the maximum FTAG drawdown of -90.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENHU and FTAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENHU | FTAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -90.89% | +81.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -79.35% | +76.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -71.25% | +69.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.15% | — |
Volatility
ENHU vs. FTAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENHU | FTAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.92% | 14.17% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 17.41% | -3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 19.60% | -5.68% |
ENHU vs. FTAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENHU has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FTAG's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENHU vs. FTAG - Dividend Comparison
ENHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than FTAG's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 0.51% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 1.42% | 1.39% | 2.89% | 3.68% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.72% | 2.33% | 2.16% | 1.26% | 0.61% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENHU and FTAG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENHU is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENHU is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTAG.
FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.51% for ENHU.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ENHU and 0.70% for FTAG.
Find the right allocation for ENHU and FTAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer