PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENHU vs. BUFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENHU vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENHU achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.


ENHU

1D
-0.62%
1M
4.83%
YTD
10.96%
6M
11.23%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFH

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.75%
YTD
2.45%
6M
2.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENHU vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ENHU and BUFH is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENHU vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ENHU vs. BUFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENHUBUFHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.74

2.91

-1.17

Drawdowns

ENHU vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENHU drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENHU and BUFH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENHUBUFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-1.53%

-7.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.05%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.49%

-0.18%

-1.31%

Volatility

ENHU vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENHUBUFHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.21%

2.37%

+10.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

2.37%

+10.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

2.37%

+10.84%

ENHU vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENHU has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ENHU vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

ENHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


ENHU and BUFH have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ENHU is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ENHU is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

ENHU has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

ENHU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ENHU and 0.95% for BUFH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENHU and BUFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer