ENFR vs. RDOG
ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and RDOG (ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while RDOG is a REIT fund tracking the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ENFR returned 11.98%/yr vs 4.49%/yr for RDOG. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
ENFR vs. RDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 24.93% return, which is significantly higher than RDOG's 17.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ENFR has outperformed RDOG with an annualized return of 11.98%, while RDOG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.49% annualized return.
ENFR
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- YTD
- 24.93%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 28.90%
- 5Y*
- 20.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
RDOG
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 17.52%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- 1Y
- 20.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.49%
ENFR vs. RDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 24.93% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 17.52% | 0.95% | 4.57% | 10.38% | -25.53% | 34.42% | -10.01% | 21.54% | -5.70% | 11.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and RDOG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ENFR and RDOG has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. RDOG — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
RDOG
ENFR vs. RDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENFR | RDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.23 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 2.02 | +1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.24 | 6.52 | +1.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. RDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, roughly equal to the maximum RDOG drawdown of -67.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and RDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | RDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -67.59% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -10.02% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | -21.40% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | -35.52% | +15.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | -49.35% | -13.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.71% | -1.08% | -3.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -12.23% | -3.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 3.10% | +0.28% |
Volatility
ENFR vs. RDOG - Volatility Comparison
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) at 4.55%. This indicates that ENFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | RDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 4.55% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.60% | 11.04% | +0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.86% | 14.91% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 19.85% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.68% | 23.05% | +1.63% |
ENFR vs. RDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ENFR and RDOG have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
ENFR vs. RDOG - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, less than RDOG's 6.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.02% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 6.21% | 6.91% | 6.11% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 3.11% | 5.12% | 3.10% | 3.13% | 3.64% | 3.66% | 3.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENFR and RDOG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to RDOG (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENFR dropped -68.28% vs RDOG's -67.59%.
On 10-year performance, ENFR leads with 11.98% vs 4.49% for RDOG. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, RDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 11.98% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENFR and RDOG have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.21%, compared with 4.02% for ENFR.
ENFR is categorized as Energy Equities, while RDOG is REIT. ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while RDOG tracks S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENFR and RDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer