ENFR vs. RDOG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and RDOG (ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while RDOG is a REIT fund tracking the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ENFR returned 11.96%/yr vs 4.05%/yr for RDOG. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

ENFR vs. RDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 24.60% return, which is significantly higher than RDOG's 13.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ENFR has outperformed RDOG with an annualized return of 11.96%, while RDOG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.05% annualized return.

ENFR

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -1.01%
• YTD: 24.60%
• 6M: 24.41%
• 1Y: 25.40%
• 3Y*: 27.99%
• 5Y*: 19.91%
• 10Y*: 11.96%

RDOG

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 3.92%
• YTD: 13.77%
• 6M: 14.44%
• 1Y: 20.06%
• 3Y*: 11.40%
• 5Y*: 2.28%
• 10Y*: 4.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENFR vs. RDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	24.60%	5.88%	42.17%	15.63%	17.48%	39.97%	-24.14%	21.60%	-18.67%	-0.19%
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF	13.77%	0.95%	4.57%	10.38%	-25.53%	34.42%	-10.01%	21.54%	-5.70%	11.84%

Correlation

The correlation between ENFR and RDOG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2013	0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between ENFR and RDOG has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ENFR vs. RDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ENFR	RDOG
Energy	98.8%	-
Industrials	3.4%	-
Utilities	1.0%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	100.0%
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

ENFR vs. RDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 50
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 48

RDOG

RDOG Risk / Return Rank: 39
RDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
RDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
RDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 36
RDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
RDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENFR vs. RDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENFR	RDOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.39	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.03	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.24	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	2.01	+0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.06	6.51	+1.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENFR vs. RDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENFR Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the RDOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENFR and RDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENFR	RDOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75	1.39	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	0.12	+0.92
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.18	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.17	+0.17

Drawdowns

ENFR vs. RDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, roughly equal to the maximum RDOG drawdown of -67.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and RDOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENFR	RDOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.28%	-67.59%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.64%	-10.02%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.58%	-21.40%	+5.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.29%	-35.52%	+15.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.64%	-49.35%	-13.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.95%	-2.03%	-2.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.98%	-12.26%	-3.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	3.09%	+0.07%

Volatility

ENFR vs. RDOG - Volatility Comparison

Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) at 3.98%. This indicates that ENFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENFR	RDOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.18%	3.98%	+2.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.47%	10.42%	+1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.64%	14.52%	+0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.30%	19.84%	-0.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.69%	23.05%	+1.64%

ENFR vs. RDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ENFR and RDOG have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

ENFR vs. RDOG - Dividend Comparison

ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, less than RDOG's 6.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.03%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF	6.13%	6.91%	6.11%	7.07%	5.25%	3.11%	5.12%	3.10%	3.13%	3.64%	3.66%	3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENFR and RDOG in my portfolio?

ENFR and RDOG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ENFR or RDOG?

ENFR has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to RDOG (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENFR dropped -68.28% vs RDOG's -67.59%.

Which ETF is better, ENFR or RDOG?

On 10-year performance, ENFR leads with 11.96% vs 4.05% for RDOG. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, RDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ENFR or RDOG?

Over the 10-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 11.96% return vs 4.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENFR or RDOG?

ENFR and RDOG have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ENFR or RDOG?

RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.13%, compared with 4.03% for ENFR.

What is the main difference between ENFR and RDOG?

ENFR is categorized as Energy Equities, while RDOG is REIT. ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while RDOG tracks S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.