ENFR vs. ECLN
ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and ECLN (First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENFR is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while ECLN is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. ENFR is passively managed, while ECLN is actively managed. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ENFR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for ECLN.
Performance
ENFR vs. ECLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ENFR
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 20.04%
- YTD
- 27.46%
- 1Y
- 28.20%
- 3Y*
- 26.81%
- 5Y*
- 22.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.53%
ECLN
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.48M | $4.07M | $3.20M |
ENFR vs. ECLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 27.46% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 4.72% |
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 12.96% | 16.78% | 22.60% | -3.36% | 5.28% | 12.26% | 8.98% | 5.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and ECLN is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2019 | 0.56 |
The correlation between ENFR and ECLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. ECLN — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
ECLN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ENFR vs. ECLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENFR | ECLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.01 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. ECLN - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | ECLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | — | — |
Volatility
ENFR vs. ECLN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | ECLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.20% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.65% | — | — |
ENFR vs. ECLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ECLN's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENFR vs. ECLN - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, while ECLN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 1.43% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.54% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.68% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.94% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENFR and ECLN have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ECLN.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 1.43% for ECLN.
ENFR is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while ECLN is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ENFR and 0.97% for ECLN.
Find the right allocation for ENFR and ECLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer