ENFR vs. CCCNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX).
ENFR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2013. CCCNX is managed by Brookfield Investment Funds. It was launched on Dec 30, 2010.
Performance
ENFR vs. CCCNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ENFR vs. CCCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 20.63% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
CCCNX Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund | 23.33% | 2.53% | 44.06% | 18.12% | 15.76% | 40.57% | -35.48% | 8.61% | -13.72% | -6.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly lower than CCCNX's 23.33% return. Over the past 10 years, ENFR has outperformed CCCNX with an annualized return of 13.43%, while CCCNX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.56% annualized return.
ENFR
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 19.00%
- 1Y
- 19.00%
- 3Y*
- 27.90%
- 5Y*
- 23.14%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
CCCNX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 23.33%
- 6M
- 23.38%
- 1Y
- 18.07%
- 3Y*
- 28.14%
- 5Y*
- 23.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ENFR vs. CCCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CCCNX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. CCCNX — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
CCCNX
ENFR vs. CCCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENFR | CCCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.97 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.30 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 1.19 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.49 | 2.95 | +1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENFR | CCCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.97 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 1.22 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.35 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.26 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and CCCNX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ENFR vs. CCCNX - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than CCCNX's 4.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.09% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
CCCNX Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund | 4.53% | 5.49% | 5.08% | 5.94% | 5.51% | 7.15% | 15.53% | 12.04% | 11.73% | 9.19% | 9.86% | 8.85% |
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. CCCNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, smaller than the maximum CCCNX drawdown of -75.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and CCCNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | CCCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -75.87% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.80% | -15.81% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | -19.52% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | -73.43% | +10.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.94% | -1.36% | -2.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -15.45% | -0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.48% | 6.36% | -1.88% |
Volatility
ENFR vs. CCCNX - Volatility Comparison
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) at 3.65%. This indicates that ENFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | CCCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 3.65% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.39% | 10.10% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 19.29% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 19.79% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.74% | 27.35% | -2.61% |