ENFR vs. CCCNX
ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and CCCNX (Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund) are both funds - ENFR is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while CCCNX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Brookfield. Over the past 10 years, ENFR returned 11.73%/yr vs 8.17%/yr for CCCNX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ENFR charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for CCCNX.
Performance
ENFR vs. CCCNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 27.46% return, which is significantly higher than CCCNX's 25.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ENFR has outperformed CCCNX with an annualized return of 11.73%, while CCCNX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.17% annualized return.
ENFR
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 20.04%
- YTD
- 27.46%
- 1Y
- 28.20%
- 3Y*
- 26.81%
- 5Y*
- 22.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.53%
CCCNX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- YTD
- 25.40%
- 1Y
- 25.84%
- 3Y*
- 24.92%
- 5Y*
- 21.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $5.48M | $4.07M | $3.20M |
ENFR vs. CCCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 27.46% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
CCCNX Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund | 25.40% | 2.53% | 44.06% | 18.12% | 15.76% | 40.57% | -35.48% | 8.61% | -13.72% | -6.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and CCCNX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013 | 0.91 |
The correlation between ENFR and CCCNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. CCCNX — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
CCCNX
ENFR vs. CCCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENFR | CCCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.28 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 3.18 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.01 | 7.50 | +0.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. CCCNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, smaller than the maximum CCCNX drawdown of -75.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and CCCNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | CCCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -75.87% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -7.86% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | -18.06% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | -19.52% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | -73.43% | +10.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | -3.32% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -15.19% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 3.34% | +0.19% |
Volatility
ENFR vs. CCCNX - Volatility Comparison
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) at 5.07%. This indicates that ENFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | CCCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 5.07% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.31% | 11.67% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 15.01% | +0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 19.61% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.65% | 27.16% | -2.51% |
ENFR vs. CCCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CCCNX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENFR vs. CCCNX - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than CCCNX's 4.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCCNX Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund | 4.56% | 5.49% | 5.08% | 5.94% | 5.51% | 7.15% | 15.53% | 12.04% | 11.73% | 9.19% | 9.86% | 8.85% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.94% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, ENFR and CCCNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to CCCNX (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENFR dropped -68.28% vs CCCNX's -75.87%.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENFR and CCCNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer