ENFR vs. CCCNX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and CCCNX (Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ENFR returned 11.90%/yr vs 7.78%/yr for CCCNX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ENFR charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for CCCNX.

Performance

ENFR vs. CCCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 26.03% return, which is significantly higher than CCCNX's 22.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ENFR has outperformed CCCNX with an annualized return of 11.90%, while CCCNX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.78% annualized return.

ENFR

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 26.03%
• 6M: 24.35%
• 1Y: 28.57%
• 3Y*: 28.54%
• 5Y*: 20.19%
• 10Y*: 11.90%

CCCNX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -2.84%
• YTD: 22.57%
• 6M: 20.56%
• 1Y: 24.30%
• 3Y*: 26.52%
• 5Y*: 19.73%
• 10Y*: 7.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENFR vs. CCCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	26.03%	5.88%	42.17%	15.63%	17.48%	39.97%	-24.14%	21.60%	-18.67%	-0.19%
CCCNX Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund	22.57%	2.53%	44.06%	18.12%	15.76%	40.57%	-35.48%	8.61%	-13.72%	-6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ENFR and CCCNX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2013	0.91

The correlation between ENFR and CCCNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ENFR vs. CCCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 59
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 56
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 53

CCCNX

CCCNX Risk / Return Rank: 34
CCCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
CCCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
CCCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
CCCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CCCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENFR vs. CCCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENFR	CCCNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	1.51	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	2.11	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.26	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	2.83	+0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.04	7.60	+1.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENFR vs. CCCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENFR Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the CCCNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENFR and CCCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENFR	CCCNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.97	1.51	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.05	1.00	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.29	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.26	+0.09

Drawdowns

ENFR vs. CCCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, smaller than the maximum CCCNX drawdown of -75.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and CCCNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENFR	CCCNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.28%	-75.87%	+7.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.64%	-7.86%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.58%	-18.06%	+2.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.29%	-19.52%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.64%	-73.43%	+10.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.86%	-5.51%	+1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.98%	-15.31%	-0.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	2.92%	+0.25%

Volatility

ENFR vs. CCCNX - Volatility Comparison

Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) at 5.93%. This indicates that ENFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENFR	CCCNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.25%	5.93%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.42%	11.18%	+0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.65%	14.72%	-0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.30%	19.81%	-0.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.68%	27.26%	-2.58%

ENFR vs. CCCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CCCNX's 1.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

ENFR vs. CCCNX - Dividend Comparison

ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, less than CCCNX's 4.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCCNX Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund	4.61%	5.49%	5.08%	5.94%	5.51%	7.15%	15.53%	12.04%	11.73%	9.19%	9.86%	8.85%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	3.98%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENFR and CCCNX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, ENFR and CCCNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ENFR or CCCNX?

ENFR has higher volatility (6.25%) compared to CCCNX (5.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENFR dropped -68.28% vs CCCNX's -75.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.