PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENEL.MI vs. HAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ENEL.MI vs. HAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Enel SpA (ENEL.MI) and Halliburton Company (HAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ENEL.MI is traded in EUR, while HAL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HAL values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENEL.MI achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly lower than HAL's 42.65% return. Over the past 10 years, ENEL.MI has outperformed HAL with an annualized return of 14.44%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively lower 0.44% annualized return.


ENEL.MI

1D
0.92%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
10.47%
6M
11.78%
1Y
26.19%
3Y*
24.29%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
14.44%

HAL

1D
0.00%
1M
1.06%
YTD
42.65%
6M
42.23%
1Y
93.21%
3Y*
6.56%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
0.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENEL.MI vs. HAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENEL.MI
Enel SpA
10.47%37.33%9.21%43.23%-23.69%-11.12%21.93%47.28%0.56%25.73%
HAL
Halliburton Company
42.65%-5.68%-18.12%-9.28%85.27%31.12%-27.72%-2.75%-42.03%-19.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ENEL.MI and HAL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.19

The correlation between ENEL.MI and HAL shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENEL.MI vs. HAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENEL.MI
ENEL.MI Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

HAL
HAL Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
HAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENEL.MI vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enel SpA (ENEL.MI) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENEL.MIHALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

6.77

-4.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

17.07

-10.11

ENEL.MI vs. HAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the HAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENEL.MI and HAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENEL.MIHALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

2.50

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.34

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.01

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.08

+0.22

Drawdowns

ENEL.MI vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENEL.MI drawdown since its inception was -58.83%, smaller than the maximum HAL drawdown of -91.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENEL.MI and HAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENEL.MIHALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.83%

-91.62%

+32.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-13.84%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.49%

-56.87%

+43.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.05%

-56.87%

+9.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.08%

-91.62%

+41.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.15%

-24.77%

+18.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.50%

-35.20%

+18.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

5.48%

-1.82%

Volatility

ENEL.MI vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Enel SpA (ENEL.MI) is 5.95%, while Halliburton Company (HAL) has a volatility of 9.37%. This indicates that ENEL.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENEL.MIHALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

9.37%

-3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.22%

24.17%

-6.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.19%

37.54%

-18.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.07%

40.08%

-19.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.80%

46.12%

-23.32%

Dividends

ENEL.MI vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison

ENEL.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than HAL's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENEL.MI
Enel SpA
5.07%5.29%6.24%5.94%7.55%5.08%3.96%3.96%2.36%2.14%1.91%2.31%
HAL
Halliburton Company
1.68%2.41%2.50%1.77%1.22%0.79%1.67%2.94%2.71%1.47%1.33%2.12%

Financials

ENEL.MI vs. HAL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enel SpA and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. ENEL.MI values in EUR, HAL values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


ENEL.MI and HAL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENEL.MI and HAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer