EMTY vs. GDXD
EMTY (ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF) and GDXD (MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both Inverse Equities funds - EMTY tracks the Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%) while GDXD tracks the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMTY returned -2.87%/yr vs -72.73%/yr for GDXD. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMTY charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GDXD.
Performance
EMTY vs. GDXD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMTY achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly higher than GDXD's -51.20% return.
EMTY
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 3.80%
- 1Y
- 1.60%
- 3Y*
- -4.69%
- 5Y*
- -2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
GDXD
- 1D
- 10.76%
- 1M
- -10.12%
- YTD
- -51.20%
- 6M
- -62.62%
- 1Y
- -93.08%
- 3Y*
- -84.24%
- 5Y*
- -72.73%
- 10Y*
- —
EMTY vs. GDXD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF | 1.09% | -1.76% | -4.13% | 0.27% | 4.32% | -37.39% | -1.78% |
GDXD MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -51.20% | -97.53% | -57.78% | -52.35% | -52.56% | -19.71% | -13.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMTY and GDXD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMTY vs. GDXD — Risk / Return Rank
EMTY
GDXD
EMTY vs. GDXD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY) and MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMTY | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.80 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | -0.97 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.20 | -1.22 | +1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMTY | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | -0.68 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | -0.66 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | -0.67 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
EMTY vs. GDXD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMTY drawdown since its inception was -77.62%, smaller than the maximum GDXD drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMTY and GDXD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMTY | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.62% | -99.96% | +22.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.00% | -96.33% | +82.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.83% | -99.86% | +69.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.83% | -99.96% | +69.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.77% | -99.93% | +25.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.01% | -71.85% | +17.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.11% | 75.91% | -67.80% |
Volatility
EMTY vs. GDXD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY) is 6.00%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) has a volatility of 47.44%. This indicates that EMTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMTY | GDXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 47.44% | -41.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | 109.86% | -97.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.71% | 136.25% | -118.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 109.97% | -87.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.67% | 109.35% | -83.68% |
EMTY vs. GDXD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMTY has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMTY vs. GDXD - Dividend Comparison
EMTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, while GDXD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF | 3.45% | 3.83% | 6.00% | 4.41% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.82% | 0.62% | 0.03% |
GDXD MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMTY and GDXD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXD has higher volatility (47.44%) compared to EMTY (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMTY dropped -77.62% vs GDXD's -99.96%.
On 5-year performance, EMTY leads with -2.87% vs -72.73% for GDXD. On fees, EMTY is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, EMTY has been the lower-risk option at 6.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMTY has performed better with a -2.87% return vs -72.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMTY is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GDXD.
EMTY has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 0.00% for GDXD.
EMTY tracks Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%), while GDXD tracks S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross (-300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for EMTY and 0.95% for GDXD.
EMTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMTY and GDXD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer