PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMR vs. XLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMR vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMR achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, EMR has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 13.44%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.60% annualized return.


EMR

1D
0.69%
1M
4.18%
YTD
8.65%
6M
5.53%
1Y
15.82%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
13.44%

XLP

1D
0.65%
1M
0.99%
YTD
11.10%
6M
9.54%
1Y
8.93%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
7.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMR vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
8.65%8.92%29.73%3.75%5.74%18.19%8.61%31.53%-11.87%29.05%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
11.10%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between EMR and XLP is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between EMR and XLP has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMR vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMR
EMR Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
EMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMR Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMR vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMRXLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.11

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

0.79

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

1.52

-0.15

EMR vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMR Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is comparable to the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMR and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMR vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMR drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMR and XLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMRXLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-35.90%

-23.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.45%

-9.69%

-13.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.62%

-12.39%

-17.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-16.30%

-13.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.77%

-24.51%

-26.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.82%

-4.12%

-6.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.11%

-7.06%

-7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.79%

5.01%

+5.78%

Volatility

EMR vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) has a higher volatility of 9.08% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 4.53%. This indicates that EMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMRXLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.08%

4.53%

+4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.24%

10.14%

+15.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.47%

12.90%

+17.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.36%

13.34%

+14.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.14%

14.75%

+14.39%

Dividends

EMR vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

EMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than XLP's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
1.53%1.61%1.70%2.14%2.15%2.18%2.49%2.58%3.26%2.76%3.42%3.94%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.53%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMR and XLP have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMR has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to XLP (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMR dropped -59.05% vs XLP's -35.90%.

XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMR and XLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer