EMQQ vs. CEFS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and CEFS (Saba Closed-End Funds ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while CEFS is a Event Driven fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. EMQQ is passively managed, while CEFS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMQQ returned -12.41%/yr vs 14.29%/yr for CEFS. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 2.61%/yr for CEFS.

Performance

EMQQ vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -24.03% return, which is significantly lower than CEFS's 15.16% return.

EMQQ

• 1D: -2.14%
• 1M: -5.28%
• YTD: -24.03%
• 6M: -23.90%
• 1Y: -21.65%
• 3Y*: 3.56%
• 5Y*: -12.41%
• 10Y*: 4.32%

CEFS

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 4.16%
• YTD: 15.16%
• 6M: 16.21%
• 1Y: 26.43%
• 3Y*: 22.09%
• 5Y*: 14.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMQQ vs. CEFS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF	-24.03%	20.66%	13.79%	4.48%	-30.70%	-32.53%	80.45%	33.86%	-29.82%	19.05%
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	15.16%	16.67%	23.48%	20.99%	-7.08%	17.86%	3.40%	28.41%	-9.97%	7.92%

Correlation

The correlation between EMQQ and CEFS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017	0.41

Return for Risk

EMQQ vs. CEFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMQQ

EMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 2
EMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
EMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CEFS

CEFS Risk / Return Rank: 86
CEFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
CEFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CEFS Omega Ratio Rank: 84
CEFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CEFS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMQQ vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMQQ	CEFS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.05	2.57	-3.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.47	3.70	-5.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.49	-0.65
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.67	4.68	-5.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.31	17.98	-19.29

EMQQ vs. CEFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMQQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.05, which is lower than the CEFS Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMQQ and CEFS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMQQ vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than CEFS's maximum drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and CEFS.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMQQ	CEFS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.24%	-38.99%	-34.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.55%	-5.67%	-26.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.55%	-13.37%	-19.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.31%	-16.85%	-49.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.98%	-0.23%	-59.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.47%	-3.65%	-27.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.56%	1.47%	+15.09%

Volatility

EMQQ vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison

EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) at 4.04%. This indicates that EMQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMQQ	CEFS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.99%	4.04%	+1.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.76%	9.01%	+7.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.77%	10.34%	+10.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.14%	13.16%	+19.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.61%	15.33%	+15.28%

EMQQ vs. CEFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFS's 2.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMQQ vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison

EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than CEFS's 7.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	7.01%	7.84%	8.79%	9.20%	11.32%	10.73%	8.61%	8.10%	10.43%	5.02%	0.00%	0.00%
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF	4.07%	3.09%	1.70%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.18%	1.29%	0.00%	0.94%	0.75%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMQQ and CEFS in my portfolio?

EMQQ and CEFS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMQQ or CEFS?

EMQQ has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to CEFS (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs CEFS's -38.99%.

Which ETF is better, EMQQ or CEFS?

On 5-year performance, CEFS leads with 14.29% vs -12.41% for EMQQ. On fees, EMQQ is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, CEFS has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMQQ or CEFS?

Over the 5-year period, CEFS has performed better with a 14.29% return vs -12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMQQ or CEFS?

EMQQ is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 2.61% for CEFS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMQQ or CEFS?

CEFS has the higher dividend yield at 7.01%, compared with 4.07% for EMQQ.

What is the main difference between EMQQ and CEFS?

EMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CEFS is Event Driven. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 2.61% for CEFS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.