PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMQQ vs. AMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMQQ vs. AMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -17.59% return, which is significantly lower than AMOM's 26.64% return.


EMQQ

1D
1.06%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
-17.59%
6M
-19.58%
1Y
-13.29%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
-10.61%
10Y*
4.86%

AMOM

1D
1.65%
1M
10.64%
YTD
26.64%
6M
27.60%
1Y
43.44%
3Y*
27.79%
5Y*
12.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMQQ vs. AMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMQQ
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
-17.59%20.66%13.79%4.48%-30.70%-32.53%80.45%14.89%
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
26.64%7.69%35.79%27.06%-26.29%13.08%53.81%9.33%

Correlation

The correlation between EMQQ and AMOM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2019

0.52

The correlation between EMQQ and AMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMQQ vs. AMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMQQ
AMOM

Consumer Cyclical

33.1%
5.8%

Technology

8.2%
41.9%

Communication Services

6.8%
14.3%

Financial Services

3.6%
6.2%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.9%

Utilities

0.4%
3.8%

Industrials

0.3%
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
5.0%

Healthcare

0.0%
7.7%

Basic Materials

-

2.7%

Energy

-

1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EMQQ
33.1%
AMOM
5.8%

Technology

EMQQ
8.2%
AMOM
41.9%

Communication Services

EMQQ
6.8%
AMOM
14.3%

Financial Services

EMQQ
3.6%
AMOM
6.2%

Real Estate

EMQQ
2.7%
AMOM
1.9%

Utilities

EMQQ
0.4%
AMOM
3.8%

Industrials

EMQQ
0.3%
AMOM
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

EMQQ
0.2%
AMOM
5.0%

Healthcare

EMQQ
0.0%
AMOM
7.7%

Basic Materials

EMQQ

-

AMOM
2.7%

Energy

EMQQ

-

AMOM
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMQQ vs. AMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMQQ
EMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
EMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

AMOM
AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMQQ vs. AMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMQQAMOMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.65

2.02

-2.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.84

2.68

-3.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.35

-0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

3.40

-3.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.83

12.24

-13.06

EMQQ vs. AMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the AMOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMQQ and AMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMQQAMOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.65

2.02

-2.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

0.53

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.74

-0.65

Drawdowns

EMQQ vs. AMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than AMOM's maximum drawdown of -39.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and AMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMQQAMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.24%

-39.68%

-33.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.96%

-13.10%

-16.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.96%

-30.26%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.31%

-39.68%

-26.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.59%

0.00%

-56.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.35%

-10.82%

-20.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.93%

3.64%

+11.29%

Volatility

EMQQ vs. AMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) is 6.58%, while QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that EMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMQQAMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

7.14%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.17%

16.72%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.46%

21.57%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.12%

23.74%

+9.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.60%

24.96%

+5.64%

EMQQ vs. AMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than AMOM's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMQQ vs. AMOM - Dividend Comparison

EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than AMOM's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
0.07%0.09%0.00%0.47%0.72%0.74%24.31%5.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMQQ
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
3.75%3.09%1.70%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.18%1.29%0.00%0.94%0.75%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMQQ and AMOM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMOM has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to EMQQ (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs AMOM's -39.68%.

On 5-year performance, AMOM leads with 12.57% vs -10.61% for EMQQ. On fees, AMOM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AMOM has performed better with a 12.57% return vs -10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMOM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.

EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.07% for AMOM.

EMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AMOM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.75% for AMOM.

AMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMQQ and AMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer