EMQQ vs. AMOM
Compare and contrast key facts about Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF (EMQQ) and QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM).
EMQQ and AMOM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMQQ is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce Index. It was launched on Nov 13, 2014. AMOM is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on May 21, 2019.
Performance
EMQQ vs. AMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMQQ vs. AMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF | -18.41% | 20.66% | 13.79% | 4.48% | -30.70% | -32.53% | 80.45% | 14.89% |
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | -0.91% | 7.69% | 35.79% | 27.06% | -26.29% | 13.08% | 53.81% | 9.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -18.41% return, which is significantly lower than AMOM's -0.91% return.
EMQQ
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -7.00%
- YTD
- -18.41%
- 6M
- -26.81%
- 1Y
- -11.51%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- -12.03%
- 10Y*
- 4.82%
AMOM
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- -1.05%
- 1Y
- 26.38%
- 3Y*
- 19.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMQQ vs. AMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than AMOM's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMQQ vs. AMOM — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ
AMOM
EMQQ vs. AMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF (EMQQ) and QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMQQ | AMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | 1.05 | -1.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | 1.54 | -2.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.22 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 2.13 | -2.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 7.20 | -8.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMQQ | AMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 | 1.05 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | 0.33 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.59 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and AMOM is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. AMOM - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than AMOM's 0.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF | 3.79% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.72% | 0.74% | 24.31% | 5.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. AMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than AMOM's maximum drawdown of -39.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and AMOM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ | AMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -39.68% | -33.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.96% | -13.10% | -16.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.62% | -39.68% | -27.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.02% | -7.58% | -49.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.99% | -11.05% | -19.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.72% | 3.87% | +6.85% |
Volatility
EMQQ vs. AMOM - Volatility Comparison
Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF (EMQQ) and QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) have volatilities of 8.66% and 8.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ | AMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.66% | 8.91% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.45% | 17.66% | -2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.48% | 25.27% | -2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.23% | 23.52% | +9.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.54% | 24.98% | +5.56% |