EMPB vs. SENT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EMPB (Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both Long-Short funds. EMPB is actively managed, while SENT is passively managed. Over the past year, EMPB returned 21.40% vs 0.00% for SENT. EMPB charges 1.82%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.

Performance

EMPB vs. SENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EMPB

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 5.31%
• YTD: 13.08%
• 6M: 12.18%
• 1Y: 21.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMPB vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMPB Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF	13.08%	14.84%	0.89%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Return for Risk

EMPB vs. SENT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMPB

EMPB Risk / Return Rank: 58
EMPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
EMPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
EMPB Omega Ratio Rank: 56
EMPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
EMPB Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMPB vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMPB	SENT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.38	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMPB	SENT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.73	-0.25	+1.98

Drawdowns

EMPB vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMPB drawdown since its inception was -7.55%, smaller than the maximum SENT drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMPB and SENT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMPB	SENT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.55%	-30.34%	+22.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.98%	0.00%	-5.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-27.23%	+26.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.50%	-20.89%	+19.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	0.00%	+2.03%

Volatility

EMPB vs. SENT - Volatility Comparison

Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) at 0.00%. This indicates that EMPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMPB	SENT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.57%	0.00%	+2.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.47%	0.00%	+8.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.39%	0.00%	+11.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.83%	12.67%	-0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.83%	13.32%	-1.49%

EMPB vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMPB has a 1.82% expense ratio, which is higher than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMPB vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison

EMPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EMPB Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF	0.78%	0.88%	0.28%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is riskier, EMPB or SENT?

EMPB has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMPB dropped -7.55% vs SENT's -30.34%.

Which ETF is better, EMPB or SENT?

On 1-year performance, EMPB leads with 21.40% vs 0.00% for SENT. On fees, SENT is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMPB or SENT?

Over the 1-year period, EMPB has performed better with a 21.40% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMPB or SENT?

SENT is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.82% for EMPB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMPB or SENT?

EMPB has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for SENT.

What is the main difference between EMPB and SENT?

They also come from different issuers: Empowered Funds and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 1.82% for EMPB and 1.01% for SENT.