EMOT vs. CIBR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EMOT (First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMOT is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Economic Moat Index, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EMOT returned 18.68% vs 16.47% for CIBR. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

EMOT vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF (EMOT) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMOT achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 17.18% return.

EMOT

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 9.61%
• 6M: 8.78%
• 1Y: 18.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIBR

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -0.83%
• YTD: 17.18%
• 6M: 14.04%
• 1Y: 16.47%
• 3Y*: 24.43%
• 5Y*: 12.73%
• 10Y*: 17.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMOT vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMOT First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF	9.61%	14.17%	5.53%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	17.18%	13.06%	15.80%

Correlation

The correlation between EMOT and CIBR is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024	0.61

The correlation between EMOT and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EMOT vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMOT	CIBR
Technology	41.6%	95.4%
Consumer Cyclical	18.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	15.9%	-
Healthcare	9.4%	-
Financial Services	5.1%	-
Communication Services	3.9%	1.9%
Industrials	3.6%	2.7%
Energy	2.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EMOT vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMOT

EMOT Risk / Return Rank: 46
EMOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
EMOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
EMOT Omega Ratio Rank: 45
EMOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
EMOT Martin Ratio Rank: 49

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 18
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMOT vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF (EMOT) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMOT	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	0.66	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	1.06	+1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.13	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	0.75	+1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.00	1.74	+6.26

EMOT vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMOT and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMOT vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMOT drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMOT and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMOT	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.41%	-33.89%	+17.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.19%	-21.99%	+12.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.99%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.28%	-11.39%	+9.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.06%	-8.66%	+6.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	9.49%	-7.15%

Volatility

EMOT vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF (EMOT) is 4.01%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 12.02%. This indicates that EMOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMOT	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.01%	12.02%	-8.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.00%	21.57%	-12.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.73%	25.25%	-13.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.95%	25.07%	-10.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.95%	23.66%	-8.71%

EMOT vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EMOT and CIBR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

EMOT vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

EMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than CIBR's 0.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.49%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
EMOT First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF	1.08%	0.84%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMOT and CIBR in my portfolio?

EMOT and CIBR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMOT or CIBR?

CIBR has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to EMOT (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMOT dropped -16.41% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, EMOT or CIBR?

On 1-year performance, EMOT leads with 18.68% vs 16.47% for CIBR. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, EMOT has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMOT or CIBR?

Over the 1-year period, EMOT has performed better with a 18.68% return vs 16.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMOT or CIBR?

EMOT and CIBR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMOT or CIBR?

EMOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.49% for CIBR.

What is the main difference between EMOT and CIBR?

EMOT is categorized as S&P 500, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. EMOT tracks S&P 500 Economic Moat Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.