PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMMF vs. FLKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMMF vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMMF vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMMF
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
5.50%21.22%9.45%20.59%-13.47%5.97%9.25%2.30%-6.64%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
27.39%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-7.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMMF achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 27.39% return.


EMMF

1D
0.26%
1M
-6.45%
YTD
5.50%
6M
8.93%
1Y
27.56%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*

FLKR

1D
2.41%
1M
-14.74%
YTD
27.39%
6M
53.78%
1Y
128.35%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
8.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMMF vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMMF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMMF vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMMF
EMMF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMMF vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMMFFLKRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

3.66

-2.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

3.85

-1.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.55

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

5.74

-3.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.64

22.99

-12.35

EMMF vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMMF Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMMF and FLKR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMMFFLKRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

3.66

-2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.33

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.33

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between EMMF and FLKR is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EMMF vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

EMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than FLKR's 3.04% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMMF
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
2.24%2.45%1.30%1.62%3.48%2.64%1.93%2.93%0.66%0.00%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
3.04%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%

Drawdowns

EMMF vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMMF drawdown since its inception was -32.57%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMMF and FLKR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMMFFLKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.57%

-50.06%

+17.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-23.03%

+12.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.20%

-49.51%

+24.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.44%

-16.79%

+9.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-22.44%

+14.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

5.75%

-3.10%

Volatility

EMMF vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) is 7.91%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 19.74%. This indicates that EMMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMMFFLKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.91%

19.74%

-11.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

30.25%

-17.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.90%

35.28%

-18.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.01%

26.00%

-11.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.44%

26.40%

-9.96%