EMLC vs. KHYB
EMLC (VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF) and KHYB (KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - EMLC tracks the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index while KHYB tracks the JP Morgan Asia Credit Index Non-Investment Grade Corporate Index.. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMLC returned 1.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for KHYB. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMLC charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KHYB.
Performance
EMLC vs. KHYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMLC achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than KHYB's 2.52% return.
EMLC
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 9.23%
- 3Y*
- 6.82%
- 5Y*
- 1.20%
- 10Y*
- 2.12%
KHYB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 2.52%
- 6M
- 3.51%
- 1Y
- 10.48%
- 3Y*
- 8.74%
- 5Y*
- 0.18%
- 10Y*
- —
EMLC vs. KHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 1.04% | 18.81% | -2.97% | 11.18% | -10.58% | -9.72% | 3.08% | 9.79% | 0.59% |
KHYB KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF | 2.52% | 9.59% | 10.79% | 3.50% | -10.15% | -12.32% | 2.00% | 8.87% | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMLC and KHYB is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, EMLC and KHYB have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMLC vs. KHYB — Risk / Return Rank
EMLC
KHYB
EMLC vs. KHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) and KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMLC | KHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.70 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 2.65 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.15 | 11.91 | -6.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMLC | KHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 3.09 | -1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.03 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.28 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
EMLC vs. KHYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMLC drawdown since its inception was -32.43%, roughly equal to the maximum KHYB drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLC and KHYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMLC | KHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.43% | -33.63% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.19% | -3.97% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.15% | -5.94% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -32.86% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.17% | -0.60% | -3.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -9.71% | -4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 0.88% | +0.92% |
Volatility
EMLC vs. KHYB - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) has a higher volatility of 2.19% compared to KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) at 0.87%. This indicates that EMLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KHYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMLC | KHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.19% | 0.87% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.99% | 3.02% | +2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.90% | 3.40% | +3.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.12% | 6.32% | +2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.05% | 5.71% | +4.34% |
EMLC vs. KHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMLC has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than KHYB's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMLC vs. KHYB - Dividend Comparison
EMLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, less than KHYB's 8.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.18% | 5.91% | 6.55% | 5.97% | 5.54% | 5.25% | 4.90% | 6.25% | 6.50% | 5.34% | 5.32% | 6.25% |
KHYB KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF | 8.13% | 7.59% | 10.11% | 15.55% | 9.67% | 6.22% | 4.76% | 4.86% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMLC and KHYB have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMLC has higher volatility (2.19%) compared to KHYB (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMLC dropped -32.43% vs KHYB's -33.63%.
On 5-year performance, EMLC leads with 1.20% vs 0.18% for KHYB. On fees, EMLC is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, KHYB has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMLC has performed better with a 1.20% return vs 0.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMLC is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KHYB.
KHYB has the higher dividend yield at 8.13%, compared with 6.18% for EMLC.
EMLC tracks J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index, while KHYB tracks JP Morgan Asia Credit Index Non-Investment Grade Corporate Index.. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EMLC and 0.69% for KHYB.
KHYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMLC and KHYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer