EMLC vs. IVLU
EMLC (VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF) and IVLU (iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMLC is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index, while IVLU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMLC returned 2.28%/yr vs 11.63%/yr for IVLU. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.
Performance
EMLC vs. IVLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMLC achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than IVLU's 12.96% return. Over the past 10 years, EMLC has underperformed IVLU with an annualized return of 2.28%, while IVLU has yielded a comparatively higher 11.63% annualized return.
EMLC
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 9.22%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- 2.28%
IVLU
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 35.32%
- 3Y*
- 23.53%
- 5Y*
- 14.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
EMLC vs. IVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 1.40% | 18.81% | -2.97% | 11.18% | -10.58% | -9.72% | 3.08% | 9.79% | -7.57% | 13.84% |
IVLU iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF | 12.96% | 46.09% | 6.76% | 20.07% | -5.73% | 15.60% | -4.50% | 15.60% | -15.10% | 23.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMLC and IVLU is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015 | 0.54 |
The correlation between EMLC and IVLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMLC vs. IVLU — Risk / Return Rank
EMLC
IVLU
EMLC vs. IVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) and iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMLC | IVLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.39 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 2.90 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.75 | 11.01 | -6.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMLC vs. IVLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMLC drawdown since its inception was -32.43%, smaller than the maximum IVLU drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLC and IVLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMLC | IVLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.43% | -41.85% | +9.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.19% | -11.69% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.15% | -15.48% | +6.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.91% | -26.04% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.47% | -41.85% | +15.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.83% | -0.53% | -3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.35% | -8.57% | -5.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 3.09% | -1.23% |
Volatility
EMLC vs. IVLU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) is 2.44%, while iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that EMLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMLC | IVLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.44% | 5.44% | -3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 12.85% | -6.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.06% | 15.65% | -8.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.14% | 16.58% | -7.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.04% | 17.66% | -7.62% |
EMLC vs. IVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EMLC and IVLU have an expense ratio of 0.30%.
Dividends
EMLC vs. IVLU - Dividend Comparison
EMLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, more than IVLU's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.16% | 5.91% | 6.55% | 5.97% | 5.54% | 5.25% | 4.90% | 6.25% | 6.50% | 5.34% | 5.32% | 6.25% |
IVLU iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF | 3.28% | 3.71% | 4.46% | 4.69% | 3.59% | 3.47% | 2.05% | 3.53% | 2.82% | 2.87% | 2.53% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMLC and IVLU have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVLU has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to EMLC (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMLC dropped -32.43% vs IVLU's -41.85%.
On 10-year performance, IVLU leads with 11.63% vs 2.28% for EMLC. Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. On volatility, EMLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVLU has performed better with a 11.63% return vs 2.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMLC and IVLU have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.
EMLC has the higher dividend yield at 6.16%, compared with 3.28% for IVLU.
EMLC is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while IVLU is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EMLC tracks J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index, while IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares.
IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMLC and IVLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer