EMHY vs. XEM-USD
EMHY (iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF) is Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets High Yield Bond Index, while XEM-USD (NEM) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 5 years, EMHY returned 4.18%/yr vs -68.89%/yr for XEM-USD. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EMHY vs. XEM-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMHY achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly higher than XEM-USD's -54.05% return.
EMHY
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 2.47%
- 6M
- 3.33%
- 1Y
- 12.77%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.18%
- 10Y*
- 4.61%
XEM-USD
- 1D
- -5.57%
- 1M
- -19.59%
- YTD
- -54.05%
- 6M
- -60.97%
- 1Y
- -94.18%
- 3Y*
- -73.79%
- 5Y*
- -68.89%
- 10Y*
- —
EMHY vs. XEM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHY iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF | 2.47% | 13.70% | 11.97% | 11.47% | -13.03% | -1.91% | 3.83% | 12.98% | -5.21% | 2.18% |
XEM-USD NEM | -54.05% | -95.00% | -39.05% | 36.89% | -76.79% | -40.13% | 542.53% | -49.78% | -93.76% | 465.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMHY and XEM-USD is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2017 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMHY vs. XEM-USD — Risk / Return Rank
EMHY
XEM-USD
EMHY vs. XEM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) and NEM (XEM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMHY | XEM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 0.76 | +0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | -1.01 | +3.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.42 | -1.18 | +14.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMHY | XEM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | -0.71 | +2.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | -0.64 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | -0.38 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
EMHY vs. XEM-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMHY drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum XEM-USD drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMHY and XEM-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMHY | XEM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.11% | -99.97% | +69.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.34% | -93.07% | +88.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.95% | -99.14% | +93.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.83% | -99.79% | +73.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | -99.97% | +99.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -90.08% | +85.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 51.49% | -50.54% |
Volatility
EMHY vs. XEM-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) is 1.62%, while NEM (XEM-USD) has a volatility of 22.35%. This indicates that EMHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMHY | XEM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | 22.35% | -20.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.34% | 56.04% | -51.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.69% | 112.41% | -106.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.10% | 88.88% | -79.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.66% | 103.77% | -93.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMHY and XEM-USD have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XEM-USD has higher volatility (22.35%) compared to EMHY (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMHY dropped -30.11% vs XEM-USD's -99.97%.
EMHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMHY and XEM-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer