PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMHY vs. EMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMHY vs. EMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMHY achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly higher than EMB's 1.80% return. Over the past 10 years, EMHY has outperformed EMB with an annualized return of 4.73%, while EMB has yielded a comparatively lower 3.29% annualized return.


EMHY

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.38%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.49%
1Y
12.96%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*
4.73%

EMB

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.29%
YTD
1.80%
6M
1.93%
1Y
11.56%
3Y*
9.74%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
3.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMHY vs. EMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMHY
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF
2.80%13.70%11.97%11.47%-13.03%-1.91%3.83%12.98%-5.21%8.54%
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
1.80%13.85%5.54%10.62%-18.63%-2.23%5.42%15.48%-5.47%10.28%

Correlation

The correlation between EMHY and EMB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2012

0.80

The correlation between EMHY and EMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.92 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMHY vs. EMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMHY
EMHY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EMHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EMHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

EMB
EMB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMHY vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMHYEMBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.30

2.09

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.44

3.05

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.41

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.58

+0.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.63

11.01

+2.61

EMHY vs. EMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the EMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMHY and EMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMHYEMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.09

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.19

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.33

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.44

+0.07

Drawdowns

EMHY vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMHY drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum EMB drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMHY and EMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMHYEMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-34.70%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.34%

-4.51%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.95%

-7.95%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.83%

-28.74%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.11%

-28.74%

-1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.37%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-5.06%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.05%

-0.10%

Volatility

EMHY vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) is 1.66%, while iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that EMHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMHYEMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.85%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.31%

4.52%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.65%

5.56%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.10%

9.75%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.66%

9.96%

+0.70%

EMHY vs. EMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMHY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EMB's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMHY vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison

EMHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than EMB's 5.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
5.06%4.98%5.46%4.74%5.04%3.89%3.88%4.51%5.64%4.54%4.83%4.84%
EMHY
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF
6.41%6.52%6.86%6.73%7.08%5.58%5.44%5.72%6.79%5.59%6.43%6.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, EMHY and EMB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EMB has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to EMHY (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMHY dropped -30.11% vs EMB's -34.70%.

On 10-year performance, EMHY leads with 4.73% vs 3.29% for EMB. On fees, EMB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, EMHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EMHY has performed better with a 4.73% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMHY.

EMHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.41%, compared with 5.06% for EMB.

EMHY tracks J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets High Yield Bond Index, while EMB tracks JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EMHY and 0.39% for EMB.

EMHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMHY and EMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer