EMHY vs. EMB
EMHY (iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF) and EMB (iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds from iShares - EMHY tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets High Yield Bond Index while EMB tracks the JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMHY returned 4.73%/yr vs 3.29%/yr for EMB. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMHY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EMB.
Performance
EMHY vs. EMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMHY achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly higher than EMB's 1.80% return. Over the past 10 years, EMHY has outperformed EMB with an annualized return of 4.73%, while EMB has yielded a comparatively lower 3.29% annualized return.
EMHY
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- 12.96%
- 3Y*
- 13.15%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- 4.73%
EMB
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 11.56%
- 3Y*
- 9.74%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- 3.29%
EMHY vs. EMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHY iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF | 2.80% | 13.70% | 11.97% | 11.47% | -13.03% | -1.91% | 3.83% | 12.98% | -5.21% | 8.54% |
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 1.80% | 13.85% | 5.54% | 10.62% | -18.63% | -2.23% | 5.42% | 15.48% | -5.47% | 10.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMHY and EMB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2012 | 0.80 |
The correlation between EMHY and EMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.92 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMHY vs. EMB — Risk / Return Rank
EMHY
EMB
EMHY vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMHY | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.30 | 2.09 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.44 | 3.05 | +0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.41 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 2.58 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.63 | 11.01 | +2.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMHY | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.09 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.19 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.33 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.44 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
EMHY vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMHY drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum EMB drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMHY and EMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMHY | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.11% | -34.70% | +4.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.34% | -4.51% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.95% | -7.95% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.83% | -28.74% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.11% | -28.74% | -1.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.37% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -5.06% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 1.05% | -0.10% |
Volatility
EMHY vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) is 1.66%, while iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that EMHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMHY | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.66% | 1.85% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.31% | 4.52% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.65% | 5.56% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.10% | 9.75% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.66% | 9.96% | +0.70% |
EMHY vs. EMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMHY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EMB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMHY vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison
EMHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than EMB's 5.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.06% | 4.98% | 5.46% | 4.74% | 5.04% | 3.89% | 3.88% | 4.51% | 5.64% | 4.54% | 4.83% | 4.84% |
EMHY iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF | 6.41% | 6.52% | 6.86% | 6.73% | 7.08% | 5.58% | 5.44% | 5.72% | 6.79% | 5.59% | 6.43% | 6.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, EMHY and EMB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EMB has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to EMHY (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMHY dropped -30.11% vs EMB's -34.70%.
On 10-year performance, EMHY leads with 4.73% vs 3.29% for EMB. On fees, EMB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, EMHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EMHY has performed better with a 4.73% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMHY.
EMHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.41%, compared with 5.06% for EMB.
EMHY tracks J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets High Yield Bond Index, while EMB tracks JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EMHY and 0.39% for EMB.
EMHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMHY and EMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer