EMHY vs. PCY
EMHY (iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF) and PCY (Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - EMHY tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets High Yield Bond Index while PCY tracks the DB Emerging Market USD Liquid Balanced Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMHY returned 4.73%/yr vs 2.72%/yr for PCY. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
EMHY vs. PCY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMHY achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly higher than PCY's 2.20% return. Over the past 10 years, EMHY has outperformed PCY with an annualized return of 4.73%, while PCY has yielded a comparatively lower 2.72% annualized return.
EMHY
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- 12.96%
- 3Y*
- 13.15%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- 4.73%
PCY
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 15.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.35%
- 5Y*
- 1.29%
- 10Y*
- 2.72%
EMHY vs. PCY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHY iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF | 2.80% | 13.70% | 11.97% | 11.47% | -13.03% | -1.91% | 3.83% | 12.98% | -5.21% | 8.54% |
PCY Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF | 2.20% | 16.31% | 2.55% | 18.48% | -24.47% | -4.30% | 2.29% | 17.66% | -6.16% | 9.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMHY and PCY is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2012 | 0.78 |
The correlation between EMHY and PCY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMHY vs. PCY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMHY
PCY
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
EMHY
PCY
-
Basic Materials
EMHY
-
PCY
-
Communication Services
EMHY
-
PCY
-
Consumer Cyclical
EMHY
-
PCY
-
Consumer Defensive
EMHY
-
PCY
-
Energy
EMHY
-
PCY
-
Financial Services
EMHY
-
PCY
Healthcare
EMHY
-
PCY
-
Real Estate
EMHY
-
PCY
-
Technology
EMHY
-
PCY
-
Utilities
EMHY
-
PCY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMHY vs. PCY — Risk / Return Rank
EMHY
PCY
EMHY vs. PCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) and Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMHY | PCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.30 | 2.08 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.44 | 2.97 | +0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.38 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 2.61 | +0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.63 | 10.61 | +3.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMHY | PCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.08 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.10 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.21 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.30 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
EMHY vs. PCY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMHY drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum PCY drawdown of -49.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMHY and PCY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMHY | PCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.11% | -49.13% | +19.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.34% | -5.91% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.95% | -11.52% | +5.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.83% | -37.17% | +11.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.11% | -37.78% | +7.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.31% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -6.97% | +2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 1.45% | -0.50% |
Volatility
EMHY vs. PCY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) is 1.66%, while Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that EMHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMHY | PCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.66% | 2.30% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.31% | 5.81% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.65% | 7.43% | -1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.10% | 13.17% | -4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.66% | 12.94% | -2.28% |
EMHY vs. PCY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EMHY and PCY have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
EMHY vs. PCY - Dividend Comparison
EMHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than PCY's 5.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHY iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF | 6.41% | 6.52% | 6.86% | 6.73% | 7.08% | 5.58% | 5.44% | 5.72% | 6.79% | 5.59% | 6.43% | 6.99% |
PCY Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF | 5.85% | 5.93% | 6.65% | 6.48% | 6.81% | 4.80% | 4.45% | 4.78% | 4.93% | 4.80% | 5.19% | 5.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMHY and PCY have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCY has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to EMHY (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMHY dropped -30.11% vs PCY's -49.13%.
On 10-year performance, EMHY leads with 4.73% vs 2.72% for PCY. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, EMHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EMHY has performed better with a 4.73% return vs 2.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMHY and PCY have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
EMHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.41%, compared with 5.85% for PCY.
EMHY tracks J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets High Yield Bond Index, while PCY tracks DB Emerging Market USD Liquid Balanced Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.
EMHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMHY and PCY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer