PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEM-USD vs. FRDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XEM-USD vs. FRDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEM (XEM-USD) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEM-USD achieves a -53.98% return, which is significantly lower than FRDM's 42.36% return.


XEM-USD

1D
-5.42%
1M
-19.11%
YTD
-53.98%
6M
-62.10%
1Y
-92.61%
3Y*
-73.81%
5Y*
-68.64%
10Y*

FRDM

1D
-1.56%
1M
12.02%
YTD
42.36%
6M
50.70%
1Y
92.82%
3Y*
36.48%
5Y*
18.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEM-USD vs. FRDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XEM-USD
NEM
-53.98%-95.00%-39.05%36.89%-76.79%-40.13%542.53%-60.33%
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
42.36%61.27%1.70%22.77%-14.45%6.13%16.90%12.33%

Correlation

The correlation between XEM-USD and FRDM is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2019

0.19

The correlation between XEM-USD and FRDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEM-USD vs. FRDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEM-USD
XEM-USD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
XEM-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEM-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEM-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XEM-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEM-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FRDM
FRDM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FRDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEM-USD vs. FRDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEM (XEM-USD) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEM-USDFRDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.63

-0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

5.53

-6.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.11

22.24

-23.35

XEM-USD vs. FRDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEM-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the FRDM Sharpe Ratio of 3.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEM-USD and FRDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEM-USDFRDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

3.80

-4.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.64

0.91

-1.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.38

0.84

-1.22

Drawdowns

XEM-USD vs. FRDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEM-USD drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than FRDM's maximum drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEM-USD and FRDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEM-USDFRDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.97%

-40.49%

-59.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-94.44%

-16.87%

-77.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.14%

-16.87%

-82.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.79%

-29.25%

-70.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.97%

-2.83%

-97.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.08%

-7.09%

-82.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.04%

4.19%

+47.85%

Volatility

XEM-USD vs. FRDM - Volatility Comparison

NEM (XEM-USD) has a higher volatility of 22.34% compared to Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) at 11.04%. This indicates that XEM-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEM-USDFRDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.34%

11.04%

+11.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.08%

21.73%

+34.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.11%

24.57%

+88.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.89%

20.81%

+68.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

103.79%

22.77%

+81.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEM-USD and FRDM have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XEM-USD has higher volatility (22.34%) compared to FRDM (11.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XEM-USD dropped -99.97% vs FRDM's -40.49%.

FRDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEM-USD and FRDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer