XEM-USD vs. XEMD

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NEM (XEM-USD) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD).

XEMD is a passively managed fund by BondBloxx that tracks the performance of the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jun 28, 2022.

Performance

XEM-USD vs. XEMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEM (XEM-USD) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XEM-USD vs. XEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XEM-USD NEM	-45.15%	-95.00%	-39.05%	36.89%	-25.70%
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF	-0.08%	13.98%	8.77%	10.26%	1.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEM-USD achieves a -45.15% return, which is significantly lower than XEMD's -0.08% return.

XEM-USD

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: -11.56%
• YTD: -45.15%
• 6M: -62.91%
• 1Y: -95.62%
• 3Y*: -74.58%
• 5Y*: -71.74%
• 10Y*: —

XEMD

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: -0.08%
• 6M: 3.41%
• 1Y: 11.17%
• 3Y*: 10.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

XEM-USD vs. XEMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEM-USD

XEM-USD Risk / Return Rank: 31
XEM-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
XEM-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
XEM-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 5
XEM-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
XEM-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 64

XEMD

XEMD Risk / Return Rank: 89
XEMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
XEMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
XEMD Omega Ratio Rank: 91
XEMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XEMD Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEM-USD vs. XEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEM (XEM-USD) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XEM-USD	XEMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	1.93	-2.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.84	2.71	-4.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	1.41	-0.62
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.09	3.15	-4.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.48	13.14	-14.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XEM-USD vs. XEMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEM-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the XEMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEM-USD and XEMD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XEM-USD	XEMD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63	1.93	-2.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.37	1.33	-1.70

Correlation

The correlation between XEM-USD and XEMD is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Drawdowns

XEM-USD vs. XEMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEM-USD drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than XEMD's maximum drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEM-USD and XEMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	XEM-USD	XEMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.96%	-10.01%	-89.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-97.36%	-3.52%	-93.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.96%	-2.31%	-97.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-89.89%	-1.29%	-88.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	59.88%	0.84%	+59.04%

Volatility

XEM-USD vs. XEMD - Volatility Comparison

NEM (XEM-USD) has a higher volatility of 23.76% compared to BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) at 2.43%. This indicates that XEM-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XEM-USD	XEMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.76%	2.43%	+21.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.83%	3.38%	+59.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	126.18%	5.81%	+120.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.79%	6.94%	+85.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	104.56%	6.94%	+97.62%