XEM-USD vs. XEMD
XEM-USD (NEM) is a cryptocurrency, while XEMD (BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF) is Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Over the past 3 years, XEM-USD returned -73.81%/yr vs 11.18%/yr for XEMD. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XEM-USD vs. XEMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEM-USD achieves a -53.98% return, which is significantly lower than XEMD's 2.94% return.
XEM-USD
- 1D
- -5.42%
- 1M
- -19.11%
- YTD
- -53.98%
- 6M
- -62.10%
- 1Y
- -92.61%
- 3Y*
- -73.81%
- 5Y*
- -68.64%
- 10Y*
- —
XEMD
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 3.52%
- 1Y
- 11.81%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XEM-USD vs. XEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEM-USD NEM | -53.98% | -95.00% | -39.05% | 36.89% | -25.70% |
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 2.94% | 13.98% | 8.77% | 10.26% | 1.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEM-USD and XEMD is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2022 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEM-USD vs. XEMD — Risk / Return Rank
XEM-USD
XEMD
XEM-USD vs. XEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEM (XEM-USD) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XEM-USD | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.51 | -0.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 3.37 | -4.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | 15.17 | -16.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XEM-USD | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | 2.55 | -3.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | 1.40 | -1.78 |
Drawdowns
XEM-USD vs. XEMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEM-USD drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than XEMD's maximum drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEM-USD and XEMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEM-USD | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.97% | -10.01% | -89.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.44% | -3.52% | -90.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.14% | -4.31% | -94.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.97% | -0.19% | -99.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.08% | -1.26% | -88.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.04% | 0.78% | +51.26% |
Volatility
XEM-USD vs. XEMD - Volatility Comparison
NEM (XEM-USD) has a higher volatility of 22.34% compared to BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) at 1.36%. This indicates that XEM-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEM-USD | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.34% | 1.36% | +20.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.08% | 3.70% | +52.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.11% | 4.65% | +108.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.89% | 6.88% | +82.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 103.79% | 6.88% | +96.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEM-USD and XEMD have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XEM-USD has higher volatility (22.34%) compared to XEMD (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XEM-USD dropped -99.97% vs XEMD's -10.01%.
XEMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XEM-USD and XEMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer