PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMHY vs. HYEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMHY vs. HYEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMHY achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly lower than HYEM's 4.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EMHY having a 4.67% annualized return and HYEM not far behind at 4.64%.


EMHY

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.64%
YTD
3.26%
6M
3.35%
1Y
12.55%
3Y*
12.57%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
4.67%

HYEM

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.26%
YTD
4.28%
6M
4.29%
1Y
9.50%
3Y*
10.35%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
4.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMHY vs. HYEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMHY
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF
3.26%13.70%11.97%11.47%-13.03%-1.91%3.83%12.98%-5.21%8.54%
HYEM
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
4.28%9.24%12.14%8.35%-13.39%-1.31%6.87%12.85%-3.38%7.94%

Correlation

The correlation between EMHY and HYEM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2012

0.59

The correlation between EMHY and HYEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMHY vs. HYEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMHY
EMHY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EMHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EMHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

HYEM
HYEM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
HYEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMHY vs. HYEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMHYHYEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.50

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.15

14.23

-1.08

EMHY vs. HYEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the HYEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMHY and HYEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMHY vs. HYEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMHY drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, roughly equal to the maximum HYEM drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMHY and HYEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMHYHYEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-30.96%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.34%

-2.73%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.95%

-5.23%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.83%

-26.29%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.11%

-30.96%

+0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.20%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-4.38%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.67%

+0.29%

Volatility

EMHY vs. HYEM - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) has a higher volatility of 1.58% compared to VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) at 1.14%. This indicates that EMHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMHYHYEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

1.14%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.43%

3.25%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.74%

4.40%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.11%

7.51%

+1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.66%

9.27%

+1.39%

EMHY vs. HYEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMHY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HYEM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMHY vs. HYEM - Dividend Comparison

EMHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, less than HYEM's 6.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMHY
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF
6.38%6.52%6.86%6.73%7.08%5.58%5.44%5.72%6.79%5.59%6.43%6.99%
HYEM
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
6.50%6.67%6.34%6.27%6.47%5.33%5.56%6.14%5.71%5.86%6.25%7.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMHY and HYEM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMHY has higher volatility (1.58%) compared to HYEM (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMHY dropped -30.11% vs HYEM's -30.96%.

On 10-year performance, EMHY leads with 4.67% vs 4.64% for HYEM. On fees, HYEM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HYEM has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EMHY has performed better with a 4.67% return vs 4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYEM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMHY.

HYEM has the higher dividend yield at 6.50%, compared with 6.38% for EMHY.

EMHY is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while HYEM is High Yield Bonds. EMHY tracks J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets High Yield Bond Index, while HYEM tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EMHY and 0.40% for HYEM.

EMHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMHY and HYEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer