EMET vs. HODL

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EMET (VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF) and HODL (VanEck Bitcoin Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - EMET is a Copper fund tracking the MVIS Global Clean-Tech Metals Index, while HODL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EMET returned 55.39% vs -46.21% for HODL. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMET charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HODL.

Performance

EMET vs. HODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMET achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than HODL's -26.57% return.

EMET

• 1D: -3.27%
• 1M: -18.40%
• 6M: -12.86%
• YTD: 0.97%
• 1Y: 55.39%
• 3Y*: 12.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HODL

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: -2.16%
• 6M: -32.59%
• YTD: -26.57%
• 1Y: -46.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMET vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMET VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF	0.97%	81.22%	-7.15%
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust	-26.57%	-6.42%	91.50%

Correlation

The correlation between EMET and HODL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.30

Return for Risk

EMET vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMET

EMET Risk / Return Rank: 48
EMET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
EMET Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
EMET Omega Ratio Rank: 47
EMET Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
EMET Martin Ratio Rank: 46

HODL

HODL Risk / Return Rank: 2
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 2
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMET vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMET	HODL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	-1.05	+2.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	-1.59	+3.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	0.82	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	-0.87	+3.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.93	-1.40	+7.33

EMET vs. HODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMET Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the HODL Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMET and HODL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMET vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMET drawdown since its inception was -53.05%, roughly equal to the maximum HODL drawdown of -53.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMET and HODL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMET	HODL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.05%	-53.20%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.58%	-53.20%	+27.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.47%	-48.83%	+25.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.59%	-17.64%	-6.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.37%	33.04%	-23.67%

Volatility

EMET vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) has a higher volatility of 11.36% compared to VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) at 10.76%. This indicates that EMET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMET	HODL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.36%	10.76%	+0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.81%	34.75%	-0.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.91%	44.22%	-5.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.47%	49.59%	-16.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.47%	49.59%	-16.12%

EMET vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMET has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than HODL's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMET vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison

EMET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EMET VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF	1.83%	1.84%	1.89%	2.02%	2.56%
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMET and HODL in my portfolio?

EMET and HODL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMET or HODL?

EMET has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to HODL (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMET dropped -53.05% vs HODL's -53.20%.

Which ETF is better, EMET or HODL?

On 1-year performance, EMET leads with 55.39% vs -46.21% for HODL. On fees, HODL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HODL has been the lower-risk option at 10.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMET or HODL?

Over the 1-year period, EMET has performed better with a 55.39% return vs -46.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMET or HODL?

HODL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EMET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMET or HODL?

EMET has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.00% for HODL.

What is the main difference between EMET and HODL?

EMET is categorized as Copper, while HODL is Cryptocurrency. EMET tracks MVIS Global Clean-Tech Metals Index, while HODL tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EMET and 0.25% for HODL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.