EMET vs. BATT
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT).
EMET and BATT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMET is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Clean-Tech Metals Index. It was launched on Nov 9, 2021. BATT is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Jun 6, 2018.
Performance
EMET vs. BATT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMET vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMET VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF | 8.57% | 81.22% | -12.81% | -12.28% | -17.15% | -0.14% |
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 7.90% | 59.70% | -13.93% | -7.05% | -32.25% | -9.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMET achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly higher than BATT's 7.90% return.
EMET
- 1D
- 5.66%
- 1M
- -17.71%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 29.28%
- 1Y
- 96.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BATT
- 1D
- 4.20%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- YTD
- 7.90%
- 6M
- 16.74%
- 1Y
- 81.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMET vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMET has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than BATT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMET vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank
EMET
BATT
EMET vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMET | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.55 | 2.54 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.93 | 2.97 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.41 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 4.31 | -0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.01 | 16.05 | -2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMET | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 2.54 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | -0.05 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMET and BATT is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMET vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison
EMET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than BATT's 1.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMET VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF | 1.70% | 1.84% | 1.89% | 2.02% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 1.72% | 1.85% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 4.14% | 2.32% | 0.21% | 3.22% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
EMET vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMET drawdown since its inception was -53.05%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMET and BATT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMET | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.05% | -69.38% | +16.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.58% | -18.00% | -7.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.71% | -16.31% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.45% | -35.41% | +9.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 4.83% | +1.79% |
Volatility
EMET vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) has a higher volatility of 15.40% compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) at 14.03%. This indicates that EMET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMET | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.40% | 14.03% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.80% | 25.15% | +4.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.91% | 32.37% | +5.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.68% | 29.25% | +3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.68% | 30.55% | +2.13% |