EMC vs. QLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMC (Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - EMC is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Global X, while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). EMC is actively managed, while QLD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMC returned 17.56%/yr vs 50.15%/yr for QLD. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QLD.

Performance

EMC vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMC achieves a 25.25% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 42.06% return.

EMC

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: 9.84%
• YTD: 25.25%
• 6M: 27.29%
• 1Y: 39.53%
• 3Y*: 17.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QLD

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 21.54%
• YTD: 42.06%
• 6M: 37.45%
• 1Y: 85.49%
• 3Y*: 50.15%
• 5Y*: 25.75%
• 10Y*: 36.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMC vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF	25.25%	18.91%	3.75%	1.90%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	42.06%	30.36%	42.82%	49.91%

Correlation

The correlation between EMC and QLD is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2023	0.68

The correlation between EMC and QLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMC vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMC	QLD
Technology	42.4%	53.8%
Financial Services	22.7%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	12.3%
Communication Services	8.1%	15.8%
Industrials	4.5%	2.8%
Basic Materials	3.5%	1.1%
Energy	3.0%	0.6%
Healthcare	2.2%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	7.7%
Real Estate	1.4%	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

EMC vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMC

EMC Risk / Return Rank: 58
EMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
EMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
EMC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
EMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
EMC Martin Ratio Rank: 60

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 69
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMC vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMC	QLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.70	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	3.16	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.41	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	3.42	-0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.54	11.92	-1.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMC vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMC and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMC	QLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	2.70	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.60	+0.27

Drawdowns

EMC vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMC drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMC and QLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMC	QLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.38%	-83.13%	+64.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.89%	-25.13%	+11.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.38%	-42.29%	+23.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-63.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.64%	-0.53%	-1.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-18.17%	+14.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.76%	7.20%	-3.44%

Volatility

EMC vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) have volatilities of 9.03% and 8.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMC	QLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.03%	8.90%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.24%	24.08%	-5.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.68%	31.85%	-11.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.55%	44.74%	-26.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.55%	44.56%	-26.01%

EMC vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMC vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

EMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than QLD's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF	0.63%	0.78%	1.13%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.12%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMC and QLD in my portfolio?

EMC and QLD have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMC or QLD?

EMC has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to QLD (8.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMC dropped -18.38% vs QLD's -83.13%.

Which ETF is better, EMC or QLD?

On 3-year performance, QLD leads with 50.15% vs 17.56% for EMC. On fees, EMC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMC or QLD?

Over the 3-year period, QLD has performed better with a 50.15% return vs 17.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMC or QLD?

EMC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMC or QLD?

EMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.

What is the main difference between EMC and QLD?

EMC is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMC and 0.95% for QLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.