EMC vs. DRIV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMC (Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF) and DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMC is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Global X, while DRIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. EMC is actively managed, while DRIV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMC returned 17.56%/yr vs 21.80%/yr for DRIV. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for DRIV.

Performance

EMC vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMC achieves a 25.25% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 42.27% return.

EMC

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: 9.84%
• YTD: 25.25%
• 6M: 27.29%
• 1Y: 39.53%
• 3Y*: 17.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRIV

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 12.34%
• YTD: 42.27%
• 6M: 41.87%
• 1Y: 92.43%
• 3Y*: 21.80%
• 5Y*: 9.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMC vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF	25.25%	18.91%	3.75%	1.90%
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF	42.27%	30.42%	-5.04%	9.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EMC and DRIV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2023	0.76

The correlation between EMC and DRIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMC vs. DRIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMC	DRIV
Technology	42.4%	34.0%
Financial Services	22.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	26.8%
Communication Services	8.1%	5.4%
Industrials	4.5%	19.4%
Basic Materials	3.5%	14.4%
Energy	3.0%	-
Healthcare	2.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	-
Real Estate	1.4%	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EMC vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMC

EMC Risk / Return Rank: 58
EMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
EMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
EMC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
EMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
EMC Martin Ratio Rank: 60

DRIV

DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 92
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMC vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMC	DRIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	3.70	-1.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	4.35	-1.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.55	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	6.92	-4.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.54	24.10	-13.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMC vs. DRIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the DRIV Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMC and DRIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMC	DRIV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	3.70	-1.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.54	+0.33

Drawdowns

EMC vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMC drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum DRIV drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMC and DRIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMC	DRIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.38%	-41.93%	+23.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.89%	-13.43%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.38%	-34.18%	+15.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.64%	-1.04%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-15.13%	+11.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.76%	3.85%	-0.09%

Volatility

EMC vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison

Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) have volatilities of 9.03% and 9.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMC	DRIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.03%	9.36%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.24%	19.29%	-1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.68%	25.14%	-4.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.55%	27.07%	-8.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.55%	27.40%	-8.85%

EMC vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMC vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison

EMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than DRIV's 0.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF	0.75%	1.07%	2.07%	1.62%	1.24%	0.32%	0.29%	1.23%	2.79%
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF	0.63%	0.78%	1.13%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMC and DRIV in my portfolio?

EMC and DRIV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMC or DRIV?

DRIV has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to EMC (9.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMC dropped -18.38% vs DRIV's -41.93%.

Which ETF is better, EMC or DRIV?

On 3-year performance, DRIV leads with 21.80% vs 17.56% for EMC. On fees, DRIV is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, EMC has been the lower-risk option at 9.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMC or DRIV?

Over the 3-year period, DRIV has performed better with a 21.80% return vs 17.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMC or DRIV?

DRIV is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMC or DRIV?

DRIV has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.63% for EMC.

What is the main difference between EMC and DRIV?

EMC is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while DRIV is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMC and 0.68% for DRIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.