PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMBD vs. XEMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMBD vs. XEMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMBD vs. XEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EMBD
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
-1.48%12.55%6.76%10.60%3.47%
XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
-0.51%13.98%8.77%10.26%1.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMBD achieves a -1.48% return, which is significantly lower than XEMD's -0.51% return.


EMBD

1D
1.08%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
-1.48%
6M
1.30%
1Y
8.59%
3Y*
8.39%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*

XEMD

1D
0.83%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
-0.51%
6M
3.45%
1Y
10.87%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMBD vs. XEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMBD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XEMD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMBD vs. XEMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMBD
EMBD Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EMBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMBD Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
EMBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMBD Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

XEMD
XEMD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XEMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEMD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XEMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEMD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMBD vs. XEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMBDXEMDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

1.88

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.85

2.64

-0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.40

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.10

-1.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.31

13.23

-4.92

EMBD vs. XEMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the XEMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMBD and XEMD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMBDXEMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.88

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

1.31

-0.90

Correlation

The correlation between EMBD and XEMD is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EMBD vs. XEMD - Dividend Comparison

EMBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, less than XEMD's 6.10% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
EMBD
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
5.74%5.48%5.83%5.29%4.53%4.99%3.34%
XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
6.10%6.15%6.30%6.19%3.08%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EMBD vs. XEMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMBD drawdown since its inception was -24.27%, which is greater than XEMD's maximum drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMBD and XEMD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMBDXEMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.27%

-10.01%

-14.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.23%

-3.52%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-2.72%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-1.29%

-4.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

0.82%

+0.21%

Volatility

EMBD vs. XEMD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) at 2.43%. This indicates that EMBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMBDXEMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

2.43%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.28%

3.40%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.51%

5.81%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.14%

6.94%

+2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.96%

6.94%

+2.02%