EMBD vs. TLT
EMBD (Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMBD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. EMBD is actively managed, while TLT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMBD returned 3.00%/yr vs -6.59%/yr for TLT. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMBD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
EMBD vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMBD achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's 0.64% return.
EMBD
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 9.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.20%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- —
TLT
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- -1.93%
- 5Y*
- -6.59%
- 10Y*
- -1.75%
EMBD vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMBD Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 1.83% | 12.55% | 6.76% | 10.60% | -13.84% | -1.84% | 11.42% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 0.64% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | -1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMBD and TLT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020 | 0.50 |
The correlation between EMBD and TLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMBD vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
EMBD
TLT
EMBD vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMBD | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.08 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 0.54 | +1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.88 | 1.29 | +7.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMBD vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMBD drawdown since its inception was -24.27%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMBD and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMBD | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.27% | -48.35% | +24.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.23% | -7.58% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.03% | -19.18% | +12.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.27% | -43.70% | +19.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -39.89% | +39.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -13.87% | +8.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 3.17% | -2.08% |
Volatility
EMBD vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) is 1.57%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that EMBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMBD | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.57% | 2.21% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.19% | 6.63% | -2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.06% | 9.50% | -3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.18% | 15.82% | -6.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.87% | 14.91% | -6.04% |
EMBD vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMBD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMBD vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
EMBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than TLT's 4.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMBD Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.66% | 5.48% | 5.83% | 5.29% | 4.53% | 4.99% | 3.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.55% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMBD and TLT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLT has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to EMBD (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMBD dropped -24.27% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 5-year performance, EMBD leads with 3.00% vs -6.59% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EMBD has been the lower-risk option at 1.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMBD has performed better with a 3.00% return vs -6.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMBD.
EMBD has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 4.55% for TLT.
EMBD is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while TLT is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EMBD and 0.15% for TLT.
EMBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMBD and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer