EMBD vs. EMLC
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC).
EMBD and EMLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMBD is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Jun 1, 2020. EMLC is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMBD or EMLC.
Correlation
The correlation between EMBD and EMLC is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EMBD vs. EMLC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EMBD:
0.98
EMLC:
-0.36
EMBD:
1.40
EMLC:
-0.44
EMBD:
1.17
EMLC:
0.95
EMBD:
0.76
EMLC:
-0.12
EMBD:
5.47
EMLC:
-0.85
EMBD:
1.29%
EMLC:
3.16%
EMBD:
7.25%
EMLC:
7.54%
EMBD:
-24.27%
EMLC:
-32.31%
EMBD:
-2.43%
EMLC:
-19.69%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMBD achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly higher than EMLC's -2.53% return.
EMBD
6.72%
-0.54%
3.53%
7.02%
N/A
N/A
EMLC
-2.53%
-0.91%
0.53%
-2.64%
-1.83%
-0.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMBD vs. EMLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMBD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EMLC's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMBD vs. EMLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMBD vs. EMLC - Dividend Comparison
EMBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.57%, less than EMLC's 6.49% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMBD Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.57% | 5.29% | 4.53% | 4.99% | 3.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.49% | 5.96% | 5.68% | 5.25% | 4.90% | 6.26% | 6.50% | 5.34% | 5.31% | 6.26% | 5.98% | 5.18% |
Drawdowns
EMBD vs. EMLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMBD drawdown since its inception was -24.27%, smaller than the maximum EMLC drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMBD and EMLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMBD vs. EMLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) is 1.98%, while VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that EMBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.