PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMB vs. MRNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMB vs. MRNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and Moderna, Inc. (MRNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMB achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly lower than MRNA's 69.24% return.


EMB

1D
0.09%
1M
1.29%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.72%
1Y
11.53%
3Y*
9.63%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
3.39%

MRNA

1D
0.54%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
69.24%
6M
69.42%
1Y
87.14%
3Y*
-26.94%
5Y*
-25.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMB vs. MRNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
2.29%13.85%5.54%10.62%-18.63%-2.23%5.42%15.48%1.19%
MRNA
Moderna, Inc.
69.24%-29.08%-58.19%-44.63%-29.28%143.11%434.10%28.09%-30.59%

Correlation

The correlation between EMB and MRNA is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2018

0.21

The correlation between EMB and MRNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMB vs. MRNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMB
EMB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMB Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

MRNA
MRNA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
MRNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRNA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MRNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMB vs. MRNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and Moderna, Inc. (MRNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMBMRNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.24

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

2.34

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

4.59

+5.69

EMB vs. MRNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the MRNA Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMB and MRNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMB vs. MRNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMB drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum MRNA drawdown of -95.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMB and MRNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMBMRNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-95.38%

+60.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-35.51%

+31.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.95%

-86.58%

+78.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.74%

-95.38%

+66.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-89.70%

+89.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-57.06%

+52.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

18.06%

-17.00%

Volatility

EMB vs. MRNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) is 2.02%, while Moderna, Inc. (MRNA) has a volatility of 17.56%. This indicates that EMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMBMRNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

17.56%

-15.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.66%

48.82%

-44.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.67%

64.75%

-59.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.76%

66.49%

-56.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.96%

72.15%

-62.19%

Dividends

EMB vs. MRNA - Dividend Comparison

EMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, while MRNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
5.03%4.98%5.46%4.74%5.04%3.89%3.88%4.51%5.64%4.54%4.83%4.84%
MRNA
Moderna, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMB and MRNA have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRNA has higher volatility (17.56%) compared to EMB (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMB dropped -34.70% vs MRNA's -95.38%.

EMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMB and MRNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer