PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMB vs. FNMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMB vs. FNMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMB achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than FNMIX's 3.96% return. Over the past 10 years, EMB has underperformed FNMIX with an annualized return of 3.29%, while FNMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.04% annualized return.


EMB

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.29%
YTD
1.80%
6M
1.93%
1Y
11.56%
3Y*
9.74%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
3.29%

FNMIX

1D
0.29%
1M
1.06%
YTD
3.96%
6M
4.43%
1Y
15.89%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
3.87%
10Y*
4.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMB vs. FNMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
1.80%13.85%5.54%10.62%-18.63%-2.23%5.42%15.48%-5.47%10.28%
FNMIX
Fidelity New Markets Income Fund
3.96%14.86%6.80%14.00%-16.09%-2.42%4.62%10.93%-7.77%10.16%

Correlation

The correlation between EMB and FNMIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2007

0.66

The correlation between EMB and FNMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMB vs. FNMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMB
EMB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FNMIX
FNMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FNMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FNMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMB vs. FNMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMBFNMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.81

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

4.29

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.01

18.79

-7.77

EMB vs. FNMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMB Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the FNMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMB and FNMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMBFNMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

3.73

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.59

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.58

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.80

-0.37

Drawdowns

EMB vs. FNMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMB drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum FNMIX drawdown of -42.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMB and FNMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMBFNMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-42.76%

+8.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-3.85%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.95%

-6.42%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.74%

-27.16%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.74%

-27.16%

-1.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

0.00%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-5.69%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.88%

+0.17%

Volatility

EMB vs. FNMIX - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) has a higher volatility of 1.85% compared to Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) at 1.60%. This indicates that EMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMBFNMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

1.60%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.52%

3.59%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.56%

4.44%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.75%

6.62%

+3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.96%

6.93%

+3.03%

EMB vs. FNMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FNMIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMB vs. FNMIX - Dividend Comparison

EMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than FNMIX's 4.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
5.06%4.98%5.46%4.74%5.04%3.89%3.88%4.51%5.64%4.54%4.83%4.84%
FNMIX
Fidelity New Markets Income Fund
4.88%5.07%4.71%5.15%3.93%3.48%4.06%4.87%4.98%5.77%6.93%4.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMB and FNMIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMB has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to FNMIX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMB dropped -34.70% vs FNMIX's -42.76%.

FNMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMB and FNMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer