EMA vs. ORCL
EMA (Emera Inc) and ORCL (Oracle Corporation) are both stocks. EMA operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while ORCL operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past year, EMA returned 20.76% vs 22.94% for ORCL. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
EMA vs. ORCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMA achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly lower than ORCL's 9.34% return.
EMA
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- 5.65%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 20.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ORCL
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 8.10%
- YTD
- 9.34%
- 6M
- -3.36%
- 1Y
- 22.94%
- 3Y*
- 25.94%
- 5Y*
- 21.81%
- 10Y*
- 20.30%
EMA vs. ORCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMA Emera Inc | 5.65% | 11.17% |
ORCL Oracle Corporation | 9.34% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMA and ORCL is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025 | -0.27 |
Fundamentals
EMA:
$15.54B
ORCL:
$617.24B
EMA:
$3.55
ORCL:
$5.56
EMA:
14.37
ORCL:
38.09
EMA:
0.46
ORCL:
8.54
EMA:
1.79
ORCL:
9.64
EMA:
1.69
ORCL:
15.81
EMA:
$8.59B
ORCL:
$64.08B
EMA:
$2.83B
ORCL:
$58.10B
EMA:
$2.56B
ORCL:
$17.85B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMA vs. ORCL — Risk / Return Rank
EMA
ORCL
EMA vs. ORCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emera Inc (EMA) and Oracle Corporation (ORCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMA | ORCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.13 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 0.40 | +3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.44 | 0.66 | +8.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMA | ORCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 0.35 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.38 | 0.49 | +0.89 |
Drawdowns
EMA vs. ORCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMA drawdown since its inception was -5.93%, smaller than the maximum ORCL drawdown of -84.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMA and ORCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMA | ORCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -84.19% | +78.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.93% | -58.25% | +52.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -58.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.74% | -34.98% | +30.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -29.10% | +27.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 35.04% | -32.84% |
Volatility
EMA vs. ORCL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Emera Inc (EMA) is 4.67%, while Oracle Corporation (ORCL) has a volatility of 21.62%. This indicates that EMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ORCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMA | ORCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 21.62% | -16.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 42.42% | -32.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.60% | 65.38% | -51.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 41.98% | -28.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 35.01% | -21.29% |
Dividends
EMA vs. ORCL - Dividend Comparison
EMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than ORCL's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMA Emera Inc | 3.87% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ORCL Oracle Corporation | 0.94% | 0.97% | 0.96% | 1.44% | 1.57% | 1.38% | 1.48% | 1.72% | 1.68% | 1.52% | 1.56% | 1.56% |
Financials
EMA vs. ORCL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emera Inc and Oracle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
EMA and ORCL have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ORCL has higher volatility (21.62%) compared to EMA (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMA dropped -5.93% vs ORCL's -84.19%.
EMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMA and ORCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer