ELMD vs. LFVN
ELMD (Electromed, Inc.) and LFVN (LifeVantage Corporation) are both stocks. ELMD operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while LFVN operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, ELMD returned 23.08%/yr vs -3.18%/yr for LFVN. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ELMD vs. LFVN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ELMD achieves a 22.42% return, which is significantly lower than LFVN's 37.26% return. Over the past 10 years, ELMD has outperformed LFVN with an annualized return of 23.08%, while LFVN has yielded a comparatively lower -3.18% annualized return.
ELMD
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 39.48%
- YTD
- 22.42%
- 6M
- 27.55%
- 1Y
- 74.07%
- 3Y*
- 44.52%
- 5Y*
- 26.65%
- 10Y*
- 23.08%
LFVN
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- 63.22%
- YTD
- 37.26%
- 6M
- 23.25%
- 1Y
- -33.52%
- 3Y*
- 25.31%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- -3.18%
ELMD vs. LFVN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELMD Electromed, Inc. | 22.42% | -1.46% | 170.85% | 4.00% | -19.31% | 32.52% | 13.41% | 69.94% | -16.14% | 56.44% |
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 37.26% | -64.29% | 197.21% | 74.03% | -39.78% | -32.19% | -40.29% | 18.35% | 177.10% | -41.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between ELMD and LFVN is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2010 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
ELMD:
$308.29M
LFVN:
$105.33M
ELMD:
$1.16
LFVN:
$0.45
ELMD:
30.64
LFVN:
18.62
ELMD:
0.84
LFVN:
0.46
ELMD:
4.31
LFVN:
0.55
ELMD:
6.27
LFVN:
3.16
ELMD:
$71.75M
LFVN:
$195.32M
ELMD:
$56.28M
LFVN:
$152.62M
ELMD:
$14.10M
LFVN:
$8.69M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ELMD vs. LFVN — Risk / Return Rank
ELMD
LFVN
ELMD vs. LFVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Electromed, Inc. (ELMD) and LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ELMD | LFVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.96 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | -0.47 | +3.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.48 | -0.69 | +7.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ELMD | LFVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | -0.49 | +1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.06 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | -0.05 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | -0.04 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
ELMD vs. LFVN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ELMD drawdown since its inception was -78.65%, smaller than the maximum LFVN drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELMD and LFVN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELMD | LFVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.65% | -99.57% | +20.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.27% | -71.73% | +48.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.86% | -83.90% | +35.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.86% | -83.90% | +35.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.84% | -83.90% | +28.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.26% | -91.46% | +82.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.81% | -89.58% | +55.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.47% | 48.37% | -36.90% |
Volatility
ELMD vs. LFVN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Electromed, Inc. (ELMD) is 26.12%, while LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) has a volatility of 40.56%. This indicates that ELMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ELMD | LFVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.12% | 40.56% | -14.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.30% | 57.45% | -20.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.78% | 69.28% | -16.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.31% | 64.55% | -18.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.01% | 61.20% | -8.19% |
Dividends
ELMD vs. LFVN - Dividend Comparison
ELMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELMD Electromed, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 2.22% | 2.84% | 0.88% | 8.33% | 2.42% |
Financials
ELMD vs. LFVN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Electromed, Inc. and LifeVantage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ELMD vs. LFVN - Profitability Comparison
ELMD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.64M and revenue of 18.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.8%.
LFVN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a gross profit of 34.54M and revenue of 43.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
ELMD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.77M and revenue of 18.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.
LFVN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported an operating income of 1.68M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
ELMD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00M and revenue of 18.58M, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.
LFVN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a net income of 1.36M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ELMD and LFVN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFVN has higher volatility (40.56%) compared to ELMD (26.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELMD dropped -78.65% vs LFVN's -99.57%.
ELMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ELMD and LFVN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer