PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ELF vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ELF vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELF achieves a -31.63% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return.


ELF

1D
0.02%
1M
-15.94%
YTD
-31.63%
6M
-35.31%
1Y
-54.70%
3Y*
-20.94%
5Y*
13.75%
10Y*

SMH

1D
0.90%
1M
25.87%
YTD
77.13%
6M
75.61%
1Y
157.20%
3Y*
64.17%
5Y*
39.21%
10Y*
37.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELF vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
-31.63%-39.43%-13.02%161.01%66.52%31.84%56.17%86.26%-61.18%-22.91%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
77.13%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ELF and SMH is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016

0.35

The correlation between ELF and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ELF vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELF
ELF Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ELF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ELF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELF Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELF vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ELFSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.72

-0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

10.59

-11.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

40.63

-42.05

ELF vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELF Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 5.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELF and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ELFSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.83

5.19

-6.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

1.13

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.34

-0.21

Drawdowns

ELF vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELF drawdown since its inception was -77.09%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELF and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELFSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.09%

-84.96%

+7.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.42%

-14.93%

-50.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.09%

-35.74%

-41.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.09%

-45.30%

-31.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.15%

0.00%

-76.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.32%

-41.09%

+8.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.53%

3.89%

+34.64%

Volatility

ELF vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) has a higher volatility of 16.90% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 11.47%. This indicates that ELF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELFSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.90%

11.47%

+5.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.18%

24.29%

+17.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.81%

30.56%

+35.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.13%

35.01%

+22.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.14%

32.57%

+22.57%

Dividends

ELF vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

ELF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.17%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


ELF and SMH have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ELF has higher volatility (16.90%) compared to SMH (11.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELF dropped -77.09% vs SMH's -84.96%.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ELF and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer