PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ELD vs. EMLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ELD vs. EMLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELD achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than EMLC's 1.48% return. Over the past 10 years, ELD has outperformed EMLC with an annualized return of 2.91%, while EMLC has yielded a comparatively lower 2.19% annualized return.


ELD

1D
0.14%
1M
0.58%
YTD
1.16%
6M
3.04%
1Y
10.62%
3Y*
7.95%
5Y*
2.57%
10Y*
2.91%

EMLC

1D
0.12%
1M
1.02%
YTD
1.48%
6M
2.90%
1Y
9.92%
3Y*
7.11%
5Y*
1.50%
10Y*
2.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELD vs. EMLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ELD
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund
1.16%21.77%-4.56%14.29%-9.25%-9.75%1.79%12.89%-7.53%12.72%
EMLC
VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF
1.48%18.81%-2.97%11.18%-10.58%-9.72%3.08%9.79%-7.57%13.84%

Correlation

The correlation between ELD and EMLC is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2010

0.80

The correlation between ELD and EMLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (3 years) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ELD vs. EMLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELD
ELD Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
ELD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ELD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELD Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

EMLC
EMLC Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EMLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMLC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EMLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMLC Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELD vs. EMLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ELDEMLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

1.45

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

2.04

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.28

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.71

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.05

5.94

+0.11

ELD vs. EMLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELD Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the EMLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELD and EMLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ELDEMLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.45

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.17

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.22

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.11

+0.01

Drawdowns

ELD vs. EMLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELD drawdown since its inception was -31.92%, roughly equal to the maximum EMLC drawdown of -32.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELD and EMLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELDEMLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.92%

-32.43%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-6.19%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.89%

-9.15%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.56%

-25.26%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.15%

-26.47%

+1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-3.76%

+1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.31%

-14.37%

+1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.78%

+0.24%

Volatility

ELD vs. EMLC - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD) has a higher volatility of 2.74% compared to VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) at 2.22%. This indicates that ELD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELDEMLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

2.22%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.11%

5.97%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.62%

6.90%

+1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.94%

9.13%

+1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.27%

10.05%

+1.22%

ELD vs. EMLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EMLC's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ELD vs. EMLC - Dividend Comparison

ELD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, less than EMLC's 6.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ELD
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund
5.80%5.38%5.75%4.85%5.29%4.98%4.70%4.92%6.30%4.68%4.86%5.57%
EMLC
VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF
6.16%5.91%6.55%5.97%5.54%5.25%4.90%6.25%6.50%5.34%5.32%6.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


ELD and EMLC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ELD has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to EMLC (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELD dropped -31.92% vs EMLC's -32.43%.

On 10-year performance, ELD leads with 2.91% vs 2.19% for EMLC. On fees, EMLC is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EMLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ELD has performed better with a 2.91% return vs 2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMLC is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ELD.

EMLC has the higher dividend yield at 6.16%, compared with 5.80% for ELD.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ELD and 0.30% for EMLC.

EMLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ELD and EMLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer