ELD vs. EBND
ELD (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund) and EBND (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. ELD is actively managed, while EBND is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ELD returned 2.82%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for EBND. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ELD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EBND.
Performance
ELD vs. EBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ELD achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly higher than EBND's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ELD has outperformed EBND with an annualized return of 2.82%, while EBND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.75% annualized return.
ELD
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 9.66%
- 3Y*
- 6.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.63%
- 10Y*
- 2.82%
EBND
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.19%
- 5Y*
- 0.37%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
ELD vs. EBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELD WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | 0.51% | 21.77% | -4.56% | 14.29% | -9.25% | -9.75% | 1.79% | 12.89% | -7.53% | 12.72% |
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF | -0.23% | 15.83% | -2.70% | 9.02% | -11.84% | -9.66% | 4.49% | 10.40% | -6.52% | 13.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between ELD and EBND is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2011 | 0.77 |
The correlation between ELD and EBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ELD vs. EBND — Risk / Return Rank
ELD
EBND
ELD vs. EBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ELD | EBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.13 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 0.75 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.59 | 2.35 | +2.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ELD vs. EBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ELD drawdown since its inception was -31.92%, which is greater than EBND's maximum drawdown of -29.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELD and EBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELD | EBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.92% | -29.51% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -6.63% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.89% | -9.25% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.06% | -26.12% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.15% | -29.50% | +4.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -3.24% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.27% | -10.84% | -2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 2.10% | +0.01% |
Volatility
ELD vs. EBND - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) at 2.38%. This indicates that ELD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ELD | EBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 2.38% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.36% | 6.27% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.55% | 7.15% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.96% | 9.01% | +1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.21% | 9.13% | +2.08% |
ELD vs. EBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
ELD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EBND's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ELD vs. EBND - Dividend Comparison
ELD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, which matches EBND's 5.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF | 5.83% | 5.54% | 5.89% | 5.26% | 4.75% | 3.83% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 4.70% | 2.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ELD WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | 5.83% | 5.38% | 5.75% | 4.85% | 5.29% | 4.98% | 4.70% | 4.92% | 6.30% | 4.68% | 4.86% | 5.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ELD and EBND have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ELD has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to EBND (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELD dropped -31.92% vs EBND's -29.51%.
On 10-year performance, ELD leads with 2.82% vs 1.75% for EBND. On fees, EBND is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EBND has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ELD has performed better with a 2.82% return vs 1.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EBND is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ELD.
ELD and EBND have nearly identical dividend yields, around 5.83%.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ELD and 0.30% for EBND.
ELD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ELD and EBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer