PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EKWAX vs. SSTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EKWAX vs. SSTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and Allspring Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund (SSTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKWAX achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly lower than SSTHX's 1.38% return. Over the past 10 years, EKWAX has outperformed SSTHX with an annualized return of 14.60%, while SSTHX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.84% annualized return.


EKWAX

1D
-3.37%
1M
-1.21%
YTD
-1.01%
6M
6.25%
1Y
61.84%
3Y*
45.31%
5Y*
22.47%
10Y*
14.60%

SSTHX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.38%
6M
1.98%
1Y
5.53%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
3.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EKWAX vs. SSTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EKWAX
Allspring Precious Metals Fund
-1.01%163.65%21.28%8.83%-7.75%-11.00%24.40%40.35%-12.83%9.66%
SSTHX
Allspring Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund
1.38%6.48%6.28%6.86%-2.32%3.16%5.44%6.64%0.59%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EKWAX and SSTHX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.12

The correlation between EKWAX and SSTHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EKWAX vs. SSTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EKWAX
EKWAX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EKWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EKWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
EKWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EKWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EKWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SSTHX
SSTHX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SSTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SSTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EKWAX vs. SSTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and Allspring Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund (SSTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EKWAXSSTHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.67

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

3.98

-1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.52

21.23

-15.71

EKWAX vs. SSTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EKWAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the SSTHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKWAX and SSTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EKWAXSSTHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.43

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

1.29

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

1.09

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

1.26

-0.94

Drawdowns

EKWAX vs. SSTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKWAX drawdown since its inception was -76.76%, which is greater than SSTHX's maximum drawdown of -14.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKWAX and SSTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EKWAXSSTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.76%

-14.24%

-62.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.03%

-1.39%

-27.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.03%

-2.05%

-26.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.79%

-6.05%

-36.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.23%

-14.24%

-34.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.39%

-0.13%

-26.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.77%

-0.93%

-31.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.29%

0.26%

+11.03%

Volatility

EKWAX vs. SSTHX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) has a higher volatility of 15.29% compared to Allspring Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund (SSTHX) at 0.71%. This indicates that EKWAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EKWAXSSTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.29%

0.71%

+14.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.84%

1.80%

+34.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.51%

2.29%

+41.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.49%

3.11%

+30.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.08%

3.53%

+29.55%

EKWAX vs. SSTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EKWAX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SSTHX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

EKWAX vs. SSTHX - Dividend Comparison

EKWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than SSTHX's 5.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EKWAX
Allspring Precious Metals Fund
1.21%1.19%0.84%0.00%2.01%1.35%1.45%0.11%0.00%1.34%1.11%0.00%
SSTHX
Allspring Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund
5.53%5.61%5.81%5.04%3.85%3.35%3.34%3.27%3.16%2.81%2.93%2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


EKWAX and SSTHX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EKWAX has higher volatility (15.29%) compared to SSTHX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKWAX dropped -76.76% vs SSTHX's -14.24%.

SSTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EKWAX and SSTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer