PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EKWAX vs. SGDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EKWAX vs. SGDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and Sprott Gold Equity Fund Institutional Class (SGDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKWAX achieves a -12.00% return, which is significantly lower than SGDIX's -9.66% return.


EKWAX

1D
-3.19%
1M
-5.94%
6M
-18.62%
YTD
-12.00%
1Y
47.54%
3Y*
42.45%
5Y*
21.84%
10Y*
10.94%
ALL TIME*
10.48%

SGDIX

1D
-2.17%
1M
-5.07%
6M
-16.02%
YTD
-9.66%
1Y
54.61%
3Y*
40.61%
5Y*
18.10%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EKWAX vs. SGDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EKWAX
Allspring Precious Metals Fund
-12.00%163.65%21.28%8.83%-7.75%-11.00%27.65%
SGDIX
Sprott Gold Equity Fund Institutional Class
-9.66%148.38%20.90%2.23%-12.96%-11.55%35.67%

Correlation

The correlation between EKWAX and SGDIX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020

0.97

The correlation between EKWAX and SGDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EKWAX vs. SGDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EKWAX
EKWAX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
EKWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EKWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
EKWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EKWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
EKWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SGDIX
SGDIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SGDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EKWAX vs. SGDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and Sprott Gold Equity Fund Institutional Class (SGDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EKWAXSGDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.23

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

1.60

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

3.43

-0.50

EKWAX vs. SGDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EKWAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the SGDIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKWAX and SGDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EKWAX vs. SGDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKWAX drawdown since its inception was -76.76%, which is greater than SGDIX's maximum drawdown of -47.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKWAX and SGDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EKWAXSGDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.76%

-47.27%

-29.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.42%

-35.40%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.42%

-35.40%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.79%

-42.90%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.56%

-31.99%

-2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.76%

-18.27%

-14.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.11%

16.52%

+0.59%

Volatility

EKWAX vs. SGDIX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) has a higher volatility of 12.93% compared to Sprott Gold Equity Fund Institutional Class (SGDIX) at 12.05%. This indicates that EKWAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EKWAXSGDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.93%

12.05%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.65%

36.45%

+2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.82%

43.56%

+3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.43%

32.47%

+1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.39%

34.29%

-0.90%

EKWAX vs. SGDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EKWAX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SGDIX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

EKWAX vs. SGDIX - Dividend Comparison

EKWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than SGDIX's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EKWAX
Allspring Precious Metals Fund
1.36%1.19%0.84%0.00%2.01%1.35%1.45%0.11%0.00%1.34%1.11%
SGDIX
Sprott Gold Equity Fund Institutional Class
0.73%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EKWAX and SGDIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EKWAX has higher volatility (12.93%) compared to SGDIX (12.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKWAX dropped -76.76% vs SGDIX's -47.27%.

SGDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EKWAX and SGDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer