EKWAX vs. EVUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund (EVUAX).
EKWAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 19, 1998. EVUAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 3, 1994.
Performance
EKWAX vs. EVUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EKWAX vs. EVUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund | 8.92% | 163.65% | 21.28% | 8.83% | -7.75% | -11.00% | 24.40% | 40.35% | -12.83% | 9.66% |
EVUAX Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund | 5.22% | 15.41% | 17.68% | -5.17% | -3.47% | 13.95% | 4.19% | 54.25% | 3.25% | 13.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EKWAX achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly higher than EVUAX's 5.22% return. Over the past 10 years, EKWAX has outperformed EVUAX with an annualized return of 18.20%, while EVUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.11% annualized return.
EKWAX
- 1D
- 6.98%
- 1M
- -18.83%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 26.99%
- 1Y
- 114.34%
- 3Y*
- 49.72%
- 5Y*
- 27.92%
- 10Y*
- 18.20%
EVUAX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 15.41%
- 3Y*
- 11.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EKWAX vs. EVUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EKWAX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than EVUAX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EKWAX vs. EVUAX — Risk / Return Rank
EKWAX
EVUAX
EKWAX vs. EVUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund (EVUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EKWAX | EVUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.63 | 1.09 | +1.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.76 | 1.49 | +1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.21 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 2.14 | +1.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.89 | 5.15 | +9.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EKWAX | EVUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 1.09 | +1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.45 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.59 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.67 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between EKWAX and EVUAX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EKWAX vs. EVUAX - Dividend Comparison
EKWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than EVUAX's 5.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund | 1.10% | 1.19% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 2.01% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 1.34% | 1.11% | 0.00% |
EVUAX Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund | 5.75% | 6.17% | 4.70% | 5.76% | 11.09% | 13.01% | 13.60% | 35.11% | 1.96% | 1.75% | 1.34% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
EKWAX vs. EVUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EKWAX drawdown since its inception was -76.76%, which is greater than EVUAX's maximum drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKWAX and EVUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EKWAX | EVUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.76% | -56.00% | -20.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.03% | -7.90% | -21.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.79% | -23.32% | -19.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.23% | -31.72% | -17.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.01% | -4.02% | -14.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.85% | -9.60% | -23.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.81% | 3.28% | +4.53% |
Volatility
EKWAX vs. EVUAX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) has a higher volatility of 17.42% compared to Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund (EVUAX) at 4.79%. This indicates that EKWAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EKWAX | EVUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.42% | 4.79% | +12.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.22% | 9.44% | +26.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.87% | 14.60% | +29.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.80% | 17.01% | +15.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.17% | 19.04% | +14.13% |