EKG vs. XLVI
EKG (First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF) and XLVI (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EKG is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Lux Health Tech Index, while XLVI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. EKG is passively managed, while XLVI is actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EKG charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLVI.
Performance
EKG vs. XLVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EKG achieves a -10.11% return, which is significantly lower than XLVI's -0.67% return.
EKG
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- -10.11%
- 6M
- -12.99%
- 1Y
- -0.93%
- 3Y*
- -0.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLVI
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EKG vs. XLVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EKG First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF | -10.11% | 6.88% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | -0.67% | 12.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between EKG and XLVI is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.51 |
EKG vs. XLVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EKG
XLVI
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
EKG
XLVI
-
Technology
EKG
XLVI
-
Basic Materials
EKG
-
XLVI
-
Communication Services
EKG
-
XLVI
-
Consumer Cyclical
EKG
-
XLVI
-
Consumer Defensive
EKG
-
XLVI
-
Energy
EKG
-
XLVI
-
Financial Services
EKG
-
XLVI
Industrials
EKG
-
XLVI
-
Real Estate
EKG
-
XLVI
-
Utilities
EKG
-
XLVI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EKG vs. XLVI — Risk / Return Rank
EKG
XLVI
EKG vs. XLVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EKG | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EKG | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 1.33 | -1.46 |
Drawdowns
EKG vs. XLVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EKG drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, which is greater than XLVI's maximum drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKG and XLVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EKG | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.82% | -8.14% | -35.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.78% | -4.02% | -16.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.66% | -1.95% | -20.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.73% | — | — |
Volatility
EKG vs. XLVI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EKG | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.57% | 10.94% | +10.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 10.94% | +16.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 10.94% | +16.13% |
EKG vs. XLVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EKG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XLVI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EKG vs. XLVI - Dividend Comparison
EKG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EKG First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.53% | 5.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EKG and XLVI have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLVI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLVI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EKG.
XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.53%, compared with 0.00% for EKG.
EKG is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XLVI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EKG and 0.35% for XLVI.
Find the right allocation for EKG and XLVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer