PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EKG vs. XLVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EKG vs. XLVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKG achieves a -10.11% return, which is significantly lower than XLVI's -0.67% return.


EKG

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.98%
YTD
-10.11%
6M
-12.99%
1Y
-0.93%
3Y*
-0.66%
5Y*
10Y*

XLVI

1D
0.67%
1M
2.30%
YTD
-0.67%
6M
0.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EKG vs. XLVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EKG and XLVI is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

0.51

EKG vs. XLVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EKG
XLVI

Healthcare

94.9%

-

Technology

2.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.6%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

EKG
94.9%
XLVI

-

Technology

EKG
2.6%
XLVI

-

Basic Materials

EKG

-

XLVI

-

Communication Services

EKG

-

XLVI

-

Consumer Cyclical

EKG

-

XLVI

-

Consumer Defensive

EKG

-

XLVI

-

Energy

EKG

-

XLVI

-

Financial Services

EKG

-

XLVI
100.6%

Industrials

EKG

-

XLVI

-

Real Estate

EKG

-

XLVI

-

Utilities

EKG

-

XLVI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EKG vs. XLVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EKG
EKG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
EKG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EKG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
EKG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
EKG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
EKG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

XLVI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EKG vs. XLVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EKGXLVIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.10

EKG vs. XLVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EKGXLVIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

1.33

-1.46

Drawdowns

EKG vs. XLVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKG drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, which is greater than XLVI's maximum drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKG and XLVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EKGXLVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.82%

-8.14%

-35.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.78%

-4.02%

-16.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.66%

-1.95%

-20.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.73%

Volatility

EKG vs. XLVI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EKGXLVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.57%

10.94%

+10.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.07%

10.94%

+16.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.07%

10.94%

+16.13%

EKG vs. XLVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EKG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XLVI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EKG vs. XLVI - Dividend Comparison

EKG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.53%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EKG and XLVI have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLVI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLVI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EKG.

XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.53%, compared with 0.00% for EKG.

EKG is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XLVI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EKG and 0.35% for XLVI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EKG and XLVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer