EIPI vs. AMDW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

EIPI (FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EIPI charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.

Performance

EIPI vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPI achieves a 16.72% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 184.48% return.

EIPI

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: 1.71%
• 6M: 16.37%
• YTD: 16.72%
• 1Y: 22.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDW

• 1D: -5.28%
• 1M: 4.62%
• 6M: 195.75%
• YTD: 184.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIPI vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EIPI FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF	16.72%	4.41%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	184.48%	36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between EIPI and AMDW is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.01

EIPI vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EIPI	AMDW
Energy	63.2%	-
Utilities	31.3%	-
Industrials	4.9%	-
Basic Materials	0.7%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	21.4%

Return for Risk

EIPI vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIPI

EIPI Risk / Return Rank: 88
EIPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
EIPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EIPI Omega Ratio Rank: 82
EIPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
EIPI Martin Ratio Rank: 86

AMDW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIPI vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EIPI	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.81	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.07	—	—

Drawdowns

EIPI vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPI drawdown since its inception was -12.33%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPI and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIPI	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.33%	-34.64%	+22.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-9.37%	+8.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.72%	-13.88%	+12.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EIPI	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.19%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.84%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.06%	83.65%	-73.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.08%	83.65%	-70.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.08%	83.65%	-70.57%

EIPI vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPI has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

EIPI vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

EIPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, less than AMDW's 42.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	42.20%	34.78%	0.00%
EIPI FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF	6.69%	9.71%	6.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EIPI and AMDW in my portfolio?

EIPI and AMDW have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EIPI or AMDW?

On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EIPI or AMDW?

AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for EIPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EIPI or AMDW?

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 42.20%, compared with 6.69% for EIPI.

What is the main difference between EIPI and AMDW?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.11% for EIPI and 0.99% for AMDW.