PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIPI vs. SPUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIPI vs. SPUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) and Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPI achieves a 13.00% return, which is significantly higher than SPUT's 5.47% return.


EIPI

1D
0.88%
1M
-3.92%
YTD
13.00%
6M
14.24%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPUT

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
5.47%
6M
5.45%
1Y
16.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIPI vs. SPUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EIPI and SPUT is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025

0.21

The correlation between EIPI and SPUT shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EIPI vs. SPUT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EIPI
SPUT

Energy

63.2%
3.2%

Utilities

31.3%
2.1%

Industrials

4.9%
8.2%

Basic Materials

0.7%
1.8%

Communication Services

-

10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.4%

Financial Services

-

10.3%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Technology

-

39.0%

Energy

EIPI
63.2%
SPUT
3.2%

Utilities

EIPI
31.3%
SPUT
2.1%

Industrials

EIPI
4.9%
SPUT
8.2%

Basic Materials

EIPI
0.7%
SPUT
1.8%

Communication Services

EIPI

-

SPUT
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EIPI

-

SPUT
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

EIPI

-

SPUT
4.4%

Financial Services

EIPI

-

SPUT
10.3%

Healthcare

EIPI

-

SPUT
8.4%

Real Estate

EIPI

-

SPUT
1.7%

Technology

EIPI

-

SPUT
39.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIPI vs. SPUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIPI
EIPI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EIPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPI Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUT
SPUT Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUT Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIPI vs. SPUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) and Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIPISPUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

4.32

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.86

16.78

-3.92

EIPI vs. SPUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIPI Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the SPUT Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPI and SPUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIPI vs. SPUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPI drawdown since its inception was -12.33%, which is greater than SPUT's maximum drawdown of -10.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPI and SPUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIPISPUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.33%

-10.55%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

-3.81%

-0.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-2.00%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-0.93%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

0.98%

+0.52%

Volatility

EIPI vs. SPUT - Volatility Comparison

FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) and Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) have volatilities of 3.22% and 3.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIPISPUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

3.12%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.35%

6.14%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.63%

7.74%

+1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.01%

11.34%

+1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.01%

11.34%

+1.67%

EIPI vs. SPUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPI has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUT's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIPI vs. SPUT - Dividend Comparison

EIPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.87%, more than SPUT's 5.11% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


EIPI and SPUT have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIPI has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to SPUT (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIPI dropped -12.33% vs SPUT's -10.55%.

On 1-year performance, EIPI leads with 19.20% vs 16.41% for SPUT. On fees, SPUT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, SPUT has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EIPI has performed better with a 19.20% return vs 16.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for EIPI.

EIPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.87%, compared with 5.11% for SPUT.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.11% for EIPI and 0.79% for SPUT.

SPUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIPI and SPUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer