PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIPI vs. EEIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EIPI vs. EEIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I (EEIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EIPI vs. EEIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPI achieves a 15.17% return, which is significantly higher than EEIIX's -1.77% return.


EIPI

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.92%
YTD
15.17%
6M
17.66%
1Y
19.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EEIIX

1D
-0.67%
1M
-7.13%
YTD
-1.77%
6M
3.94%
1Y
17.39%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
4.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EIPI vs. EEIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPI has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than EEIIX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EIPI vs. EEIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIPI
EIPI Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
EIPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPI Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

EEIIX
EEIIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EEIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
EEIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIPI vs. EEIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I (EEIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIPIEEIIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

2.67

-1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.82

3.64

-1.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.55

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

2.42

-0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.06

11.28

-4.21

EIPI vs. EEIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the EEIIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPI and EEIIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIPIEEIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.67

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.68

0.39

+1.29

Correlation

The correlation between EIPI and EEIIX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EIPI vs. EEIIX - Dividend Comparison

EIPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, less than EEIIX's 10.84% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIPI
FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF
6.67%9.71%6.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEIIX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I
10.84%10.36%11.46%11.62%13.71%11.49%10.06%13.31%10.80%9.04%11.27%12.21%

Drawdowns

EIPI vs. EEIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPI drawdown since its inception was -12.33%, smaller than the maximum EEIIX drawdown of -31.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPI and EEIIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EIPIEEIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.33%

-31.11%

+18.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-7.20%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-7.20%

+6.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-8.77%

+7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

1.54%

+1.28%

Volatility

EIPI vs. EEIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) is 2.58%, while Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I (EEIIX) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that EIPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EIPIEEIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

3.56%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.88%

5.11%

+1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.97%

6.68%

+7.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.24%

7.95%

+5.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.24%

8.38%

+4.86%