EIPCX vs. EHSTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EIPCX (Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I) and EHSTX (Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund) are both mutual funds - EIPCX is a Commodities fund managed by Eaton Vance, while EHSTX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, EIPCX returned 11.11%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for EHSTX. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EIPCX charges 0.66%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for EHSTX.

Performance

EIPCX vs. EHSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I (EIPCX) and Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPCX achieves a 22.47% return, which is significantly higher than EHSTX's 12.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EIPCX having a 11.11% annualized return and EHSTX not far behind at 10.93%.

EIPCX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -0.98%
• YTD: 22.47%
• 6M: 24.66%
• 1Y: 41.92%
• 3Y*: 18.72%
• 5Y*: 14.88%
• 10Y*: 11.11%

EHSTX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 3.92%
• YTD: 12.24%
• 6M: 13.35%
• 1Y: 23.28%
• 3Y*: 14.87%
• 5Y*: 9.17%
• 10Y*: 10.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIPCX vs. EHSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EIPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I	22.47%	22.27%	9.97%	-4.70%	17.76%	30.13%	7.83%	9.58%	-9.45%	7.07%
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund	12.24%	12.11%	11.25%	7.93%	-2.80%	24.25%	2.29%	30.84%	-6.96%	14.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EIPCX and EHSTX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2011	0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between EIPCX and EHSTX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

EIPCX vs. EHSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIPCX

EIPCX Risk / Return Rank: 89
EIPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
EIPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
EIPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EIPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
EIPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

EHSTX

EHSTX Risk / Return Rank: 55
EHSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
EHSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
EHSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
EHSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
EHSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIPCX vs. EHSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I (EIPCX) and Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EIPCX	EHSTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	2.17	+0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	3.05	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.38	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.89	2.92	+2.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.06	11.82	+9.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EIPCX vs. EHSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIPCX Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the EHSTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPCX and EHSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EIPCX	EHSTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.10	2.17	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.02	0.63	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.63	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.53	-0.27

Drawdowns

EIPCX vs. EHSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPCX drawdown since its inception was -54.05%, roughly equal to the maximum EHSTX drawdown of -53.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPCX and EHSTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIPCX	EHSTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.05%	-53.47%	-0.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.26%	-8.29%	+1.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.46%	-16.44%	+5.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.00%	-16.44%	-1.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.53%	-39.30%	+10.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.91%	-0.53%	-3.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.24%	-7.40%	-16.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	2.04%	-0.01%

Volatility

EIPCX vs. EHSTX - Volatility Comparison

Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I (EIPCX) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) at 3.37%. This indicates that EIPCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EHSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EIPCX	EHSTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.23%	3.37%	+0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.63%	8.31%	+3.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.87%	11.16%	+2.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.64%	14.74%	-0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.27%	17.28%	-4.01%

EIPCX vs. EHSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPCX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than EHSTX's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

EIPCX vs. EHSTX - Dividend Comparison

EIPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.88%, more than EHSTX's 5.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund	5.42%	6.12%	4.03%	2.93%	4.25%	7.32%	1.94%	2.76%	10.94%	5.88%	1.33%	11.02%
EIPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I	10.88%	13.33%	5.65%	3.69%	14.93%	13.83%	3.10%	1.54%	0.87%	5.14%	6.59%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EIPCX and EHSTX in my portfolio?

EIPCX and EHSTX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EIPCX or EHSTX?

EIPCX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to EHSTX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIPCX dropped -54.05% vs EHSTX's -53.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EIPCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.