PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIPCX vs. EAPCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIPCX vs. EAPCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I (EIPCX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EIPCX having a 20.06% return and EAPCX slightly lower at 19.85%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EIPCX having a 10.87% annualized return and EAPCX not far behind at 10.62%.


EIPCX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.57%
6M
11.64%
YTD
20.06%
1Y
37.22%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
13.69%
10Y*
10.87%
ALL TIME*
3.22%

EAPCX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.51%
6M
11.51%
YTD
19.85%
1Y
36.85%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
13.40%
10Y*
10.62%
ALL TIME*
3.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EIPCX vs. EAPCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIPCX
Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I
20.06%22.27%9.97%-4.70%17.76%30.13%7.83%9.58%-9.45%7.07%
EAPCX
Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
19.85%22.06%9.63%-4.87%17.26%29.92%7.77%9.19%-9.60%6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between EIPCX and EAPCX is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.99

The correlation between EIPCX and EAPCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIPCX vs. EAPCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EIPCX
EIPCX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EIPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

EAPCX
EAPCX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
EAPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EAPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EIPCX vs. EAPCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I (EIPCX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIPCXEAPCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.41

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.77

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

9.01

+0.12

EIPCX vs. EAPCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIPCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the EAPCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPCX and EAPCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIPCX vs. EAPCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPCX drawdown since its inception was -54.05%, roughly equal to the maximum EAPCX drawdown of -52.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPCX and EAPCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIPCXEAPCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.05%

-52.59%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.19%

-12.23%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.19%

-12.23%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.00%

-18.05%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.53%

-28.81%

+0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.80%

-5.88%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.06%

-22.60%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

3.78%

-0.01%

Volatility

EIPCX vs. EAPCX - Volatility Comparison

Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I (EIPCX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) have volatilities of 3.50% and 3.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIPCXEAPCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

3.54%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.28%

11.27%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.36%

14.37%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

14.55%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.28%

13.27%

+0.01%

EIPCX vs. EAPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPCX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPCX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIPCX vs. EAPCX - Dividend Comparison

EIPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.10%, which matches EAPCX's 11.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EAPCX
Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
11.04%13.23%5.46%3.43%14.80%13.74%3.01%1.11%0.41%4.98%6.49%
EIPCX
Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I
11.10%13.33%5.65%3.69%14.93%13.83%3.10%1.54%0.87%5.14%6.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, EIPCX and EAPCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EAPCX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to EIPCX (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIPCX dropped -54.05% vs EAPCX's -52.59%.

EIPCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIPCX and EAPCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer