PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIPCX vs. AAAZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIPCX vs. AAAZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I (EIPCX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPCX achieves a 15.38% return, which is significantly higher than AAAZX's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, EIPCX has outperformed AAAZX with an annualized return of 10.35%, while AAAZX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.37% annualized return.


EIPCX

1D
-0.52%
1M
-5.79%
YTD
15.38%
6M
14.52%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
13.80%
10Y*
10.35%

AAAZX

1D
0.29%
1M
-3.34%
YTD
8.70%
6M
8.35%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
11.32%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
7.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIPCX vs. AAAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIPCX
Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I
15.38%22.27%9.97%-4.70%17.76%30.13%7.83%9.58%-9.45%7.07%
AAAZX
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund
8.70%13.14%5.49%2.64%-9.57%23.83%3.91%21.79%-5.05%14.97%

Correlation

The correlation between EIPCX and AAAZX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2011

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIPCX vs. AAAZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIPCX
EIPCX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EIPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAZX
AAAZX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AAAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIPCX vs. AAAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I (EIPCX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIPCXAAAZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.54

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

8.18

+2.43

EIPCX vs. AAAZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIPCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the AAAZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPCX and AAAZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIPCX vs. AAAZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPCX drawdown since its inception was -54.05%, which is greater than AAAZX's maximum drawdown of -40.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPCX and AAAZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIPCXAAAZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.05%

-40.45%

-13.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.47%

-5.68%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.46%

-10.15%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.00%

-22.52%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.53%

-29.44%

+0.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.47%

-4.56%

-4.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.18%

-6.61%

-17.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

1.75%

+0.94%

Volatility

EIPCX vs. AAAZX - Volatility Comparison

Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I (EIPCX) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX) at 2.54%. This indicates that EIPCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIPCXAAAZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

2.54%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.81%

7.48%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.06%

9.29%

+4.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.58%

12.11%

+2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.27%

12.72%

+0.55%

EIPCX vs. AAAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPCX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAZX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIPCX vs. AAAZX - Dividend Comparison

EIPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.55%, more than AAAZX's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAAZX
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund
1.79%4.15%2.85%2.40%4.50%2.62%1.60%2.07%1.89%1.79%1.82%2.53%
EIPCX
Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I
11.55%13.33%5.65%3.69%14.93%13.83%3.10%1.54%0.87%5.14%6.59%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIPCX and AAAZX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIPCX has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to AAAZX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIPCX dropped -54.05% vs AAAZX's -40.45%.

EIPCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIPCX and AAAZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer