EINC vs. HODL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) and HODL (VanEck Bitcoin Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index, while HODL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EINC returned 26.00% vs -38.56% for HODL. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EINC charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HODL.

Performance

EINC vs. HODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than HODL's -25.27% return.

EINC

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: 24.74%
• 6M: 24.40%
• 1Y: 26.00%
• 3Y*: 29.18%
• 5Y*: 20.73%
• 10Y*: 11.62%

HODL

• 1D: -2.79%
• 1M: -18.34%
• YTD: -25.27%
• 6M: -29.73%
• 1Y: -38.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EINC vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	24.74%	7.11%	42.94%
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust	-25.27%	-6.42%	99.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EINC and HODL is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024	0.17

The correlation between EINC and HODL shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EINC vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 53
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 53

HODL

HODL Risk / Return Rank: 2
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 2
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EINC vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EINC	HODL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	-0.89	+2.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	-1.23	+3.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	0.86	+0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	-0.79	+4.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.18	-1.36	+10.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EINC vs. HODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EINC Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the HODL Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EINC and HODL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EINC	HODL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	-0.89	+2.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.30	-0.27

Drawdowns

EINC vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than HODL's maximum drawdown of -49.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and HODL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EINC	HODL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.55%	-49.25%	-38.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.89%	-49.25%	+41.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.44%	-47.93%	+42.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.29%	-15.97%	-28.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.85%	28.35%	-25.50%

Volatility

EINC vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) is 6.39%, while VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that EINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EINC	HODL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.39%	9.43%	-3.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.57%	34.37%	-22.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.72%	43.51%	-28.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.58%	49.88%	-30.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.43%	49.88%	-24.45%

EINC vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than HODL's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

EINC vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison

EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, while HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	3.55%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EINC and HODL in my portfolio?

EINC and HODL have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EINC or HODL?

HODL has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to EINC (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EINC dropped -87.55% vs HODL's -49.25%.

Which ETF is better, EINC or HODL?

On 1-year performance, EINC leads with 26.00% vs -38.56% for HODL. On fees, HODL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EINC or HODL?

Over the 1-year period, EINC has performed better with a 26.00% return vs -38.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EINC or HODL?

HODL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EINC or HODL?

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 0.00% for HODL.

What is the main difference between EINC and HODL?

EINC is categorized as Energy Equities, while HODL is Cryptocurrency. EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index, while HODL tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EINC and 0.25% for HODL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.