PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIFGX vs. EIRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EIFGX vs. EIRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) and Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund (EIRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EIFGX vs. EIRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIFGX
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund
-7.86%14.48%42.07%42.23%-32.01%16.33%44.64%35.77%0.68%25.44%
EIRAX
Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund
-0.95%12.89%7.68%6.80%-14.73%7.22%9.83%16.28%-7.47%15.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIFGX achieves a -7.86% return, which is significantly lower than EIRAX's -0.95% return. Over the past 10 years, EIFGX has outperformed EIRAX with an annualized return of 16.10%, while EIRAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.60% annualized return.


EIFGX

1D
0.89%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
-7.86%
6M
-7.26%
1Y
13.61%
3Y*
23.35%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
16.10%

EIRAX

1D
0.84%
1M
-2.68%
YTD
-0.95%
6M
1.61%
1Y
11.35%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
2.77%
10Y*
5.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EIFGX vs. EIRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIFGX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than EIRAX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EIFGX vs. EIRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIFGX
EIFGX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EIFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
EIFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

EIRAX
EIRAX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EIRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EIRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIFGX vs. EIRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) and Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund (EIRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIFGXEIRAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

1.16

-0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.13

1.70

-0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.24

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

1.56

-0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.78

6.77

-2.99

EIFGX vs. EIRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIFGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the EIRAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIFGX and EIRAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIFGXEIRAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

1.16

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.32

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.62

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.62

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between EIFGX and EIRAX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EIFGX vs. EIRAX - Dividend Comparison

EIFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.48%, more than EIRAX's 2.83% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIFGX
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund
27.48%25.32%10.78%2.74%32.69%16.44%8.74%9.36%10.11%0.29%0.00%1.25%
EIRAX
Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund
2.83%2.80%2.35%2.58%1.11%5.68%3.13%7.42%2.98%2.35%0.73%1.59%

Drawdowns

EIFGX vs. EIRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIFGX drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, which is greater than EIRAX's maximum drawdown of -19.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFGX and EIRAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EIFGXEIRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.93%

-19.85%

-17.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.60%

-7.73%

-6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.93%

-19.85%

-17.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.93%

-19.85%

-17.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.64%

-4.99%

-5.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-3.86%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

1.78%

+2.36%

Volatility

EIFGX vs. EIRAX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund (EIRAX) at 4.59%. This indicates that EIFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EIFGXEIRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.69%

4.59%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

6.95%

+5.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.93%

10.07%

+11.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.05%

8.69%

+13.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.70%

9.07%

+12.63%