EGLN.L vs. RBOT.TO
EGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and RBOT.TO (Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while RBOT.TO is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EGLN.L returned 18.47%/yr vs -2.31%/yr for RBOT.TO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EGLN.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for RBOT.TO.
Performance
EGLN.L vs. RBOT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EGLN.L is traded in EUR, while RBOT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the RBOT.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGLN.L achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than RBOT.TO's 1.12% return.
EGLN.L
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -9.29%
- YTD
- -0.76%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 22.86%
- 3Y*
- 26.28%
- 5Y*
- 18.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
RBOT.TO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -10.68%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 14.19%
- 3Y*
- 2.64%
- 5Y*
- -2.31%
- 10Y*
- —
EGLN.L vs. RBOT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -0.76% | 46.01% | 34.32% | 9.37% | 6.00% | 3.85% | 13.68% | 20.59% | 3.38% | -0.75% |
RBOT.TO Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF | 1.12% | 0.15% | 11.18% | 35.92% | -44.06% | 16.20% | 39.27% | 37.01% | -28.95% | -3.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGLN.L and RBOT.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2017 | 0.03 |
The correlation between EGLN.L and RBOT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGLN.L vs. RBOT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EGLN.L
RBOT.TO
EGLN.L vs. RBOT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EGLN.L | RBOT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.12 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 0.84 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.36 | 2.59 | +0.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EGLN.L vs. RBOT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -47.44%, smaller than the maximum RBOT.TO drawdown of -54.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGLN.L and RBOT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGLN.L | RBOT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.44% | -54.33% | +6.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.94% | -17.51% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.94% | -33.19% | +11.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.94% | -54.33% | +32.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.73% | -24.00% | +4.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.54% | -22.62% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.17% | 5.67% | +1.50% |
Volatility
EGLN.L vs. RBOT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) is 6.72%, while Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) has a volatility of 8.30%. This indicates that EGLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBOT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGLN.L | RBOT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.72% | 8.30% | -1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.79% | 17.81% | +2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.72% | 24.41% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 26.29% | -9.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 25.93% | -9.93% |
EGLN.L vs. RBOT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGLN.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RBOT.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGLN.L vs. RBOT.TO - Dividend Comparison
EGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RBOT.TO Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.85% | 0.11% | 0.52% | 0.04% | 0.17% | 0.67% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGLN.L and RBOT.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EGLN.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RBOT.TO.
EGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while RBOT.TO is Robotics. EGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while RBOT.TO tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EGLN.L and 0.65% for RBOT.TO.
Find the right allocation for EGLN.L and RBOT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer