PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EGGS vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EGGS vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGGS achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -30.44% return.


EGGS

1D
2.45%
1M
-7.60%
6M
8.61%
YTD
5.83%
1Y
7.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.62%

MSTZ

1D
8.95%
1M
7.38%
6M
-24.16%
YTD
-30.44%
1Y
159.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-86.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$346.93K$392.42K$515.09K
$101.73M$133.33M$177.41M

EGGS vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EGGS
NestYield Total Return Guard ETF
5.83%14.41%-1.62%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
-30.44%-38.95%37.09%

Correlation

The correlation between EGGS and MSTZ is -0.38, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024

-0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EGGS vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EGGS
EGGS Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EGGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGGS Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
EGGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGGS Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EGGS vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EGGSMSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.28

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

2.44

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.45

4.53

-4.09

EGGS vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGGS and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EGGS vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGGS drawdown since its inception was -24.23%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGS and MSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EGGSMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.23%

-99.38%

+75.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.23%

-84.89%

+60.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.16%

-97.63%

+81.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.12%

-94.63%

+88.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.07%

45.62%

-36.55%

Volatility

EGGS vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) is 16.49%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 37.86%. This indicates that EGGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EGGSMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.49%

37.86%

-21.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.07%

134.52%

-107.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.46%

150.23%

-119.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.34%

169.87%

-141.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.34%

169.87%

-141.53%

EGGS vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGGS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EGGS vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

EGGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.32%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


EGGS and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (37.86%) compared to EGGS (16.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGS dropped -24.23% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 159.07% vs 7.11% for EGGS. On fees, EGGS is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, EGGS has been the lower-risk option at 16.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 159.07% return vs 7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EGGS is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

EGGS has the higher dividend yield at 19.32%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

EGGS is categorized as Derivative Income, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: NestYield and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGS and 1.05% for MSTZ.

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EGGS and MSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer