EGGS vs. KQQQ
EGGS (NestYield Total Return Guard ETF) and KQQQ (Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EGGS is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by NestYield, while KQQQ is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Kurv. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EGGS returned 28.00% vs 45.84% for KQQQ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EGGS charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for KQQQ.
Performance
EGGS vs. KQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGGS achieves a 17.56% return, which is significantly lower than KQQQ's 20.43% return.
EGGS
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- 10.44%
- YTD
- 17.56%
- 6M
- 15.63%
- 1Y
- 28.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KQQQ
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 11.08%
- YTD
- 20.43%
- 6M
- 17.74%
- 1Y
- 45.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EGGS vs. KQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF | 17.56% | 14.41% | -1.96% |
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF | 20.43% | 16.64% | -1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGGS and KQQQ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024 | 0.77 |
The correlation between EGGS and KQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGGS vs. KQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
EGGS
KQQQ
EGGS vs. KQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EGGS | KQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 2.54 | -1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 3.32 | -1.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.43 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 2.71 | -1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.71 | 8.99 | -5.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EGGS | KQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 2.54 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 1.17 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
EGGS vs. KQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGGS drawdown since its inception was -18.52%, smaller than the maximum KQQQ drawdown of -26.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGS and KQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGGS | KQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -26.15% | +7.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.17% | -17.30% | -0.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -4.72% | -1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.96% | 5.22% | +2.74% |
Volatility
EGGS vs. KQQQ - Volatility Comparison
NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) has a higher volatility of 8.87% compared to Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) at 6.34%. This indicates that EGGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGGS | KQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.87% | 6.34% | +2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.12% | 14.28% | +4.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.31% | 18.13% | +5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.41% | 23.44% | +0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.41% | 23.44% | +0.97% |
EGGS vs. KQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGGS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than KQQQ's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGGS vs. KQQQ - Dividend Comparison
EGGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.44%, more than KQQQ's 13.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF | 15.44% | 14.52% | 0.00% |
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF | 13.58% | 12.01% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGGS and KQQQ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EGGS has higher volatility (8.87%) compared to KQQQ (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGS dropped -18.52% vs KQQQ's -26.15%.
On 1-year performance, KQQQ leads with 45.84% vs 28.00% for EGGS. On fees, EGGS is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, KQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KQQQ has performed better with a 45.84% return vs 28.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EGGS is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KQQQ.
EGGS has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 13.58% for KQQQ.
EGGS is categorized as Derivative Income, while KQQQ is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: NestYield and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGS and 0.99% for KQQQ.
KQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EGGS and KQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer